Assessing coherence through linguistic connectives: Analysis of speech in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders

被引:9
作者
Corona-Hernandez, H. [1 ,5 ]
de Boer, J. N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brederoo, S. G. [1 ,4 ]
Voppel, A. E. [1 ]
Sommer, I. E. C. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Biomed Sci Cells & Syst, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Psychiat, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Brain Ctr Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Psychiat, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Dept Biomed Sci Cells & Syst, Cognit Neurosci Ctr, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Internal Zipcode FA32,Antonius Deusinglaan 2, NL-9713 AW Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Classification; Disorganized speech; Grammatical connectivity; Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders; Semantic cosine similarity; Word2vec; LANGUAGE; PSYCHOSIS; COMPLEXITY; NARRATIVES; FREQUENCY; PANSS; DUTCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.schres.2022.06.013
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Incoherent speech is a core diagnostic symptom of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSD) that can be studied using semantic space models. Since linguistic connectives signal relations between words, they and their surrounding words might represent linguistic loci to detect unusual coherence in speech. Therefore, we investigated whether connectives' measures are useful to assess incoherent speech in SSD.Methods: Connectives and their surrounding words were extracted from transcripts of spontaneous speech of 50 SSD-patients and 50 control participants. Using word2vec, two different cosine similarities were calculated: those of connectives and their surrounding words (connectives-related similarity), and those of free-of-connectives words-chunks (non-connectives similarity). Differences between groups in proportion of five types of connectives were assessed using generalized logistic models, and connectives-related similarity was analyzed through non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. These features were evaluated in classification tasks to differentiate between groups. Results: SSD-patients used less contingency (e.g., because) (p = .008) and multiclass connectives (e.g., as) (p < .001) than control participants. SSD-patients had higher minimum similarity of multiclass (adj-p = .04) and temporality connectives (e.g., after) (adj-p < .001), narrower similarity-range of expansion (e.g., and) (adj-p = .002) and multiclass connectives (adj-p = .04), and lower maximum similarity of expansion connectives (adj-p = .005). Using connectives' features alone, SSD-patients and controls could be distinguished with 85 % accuracy.Discussion: Our results show that SSD-speech can be distinguished from speech of control participants with high accuracy, based solely on connectives' features. We conclude that including connectives could strengthen computational models to categorize SSD.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 58
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2022, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Text Revision, V5th ed., text rev.
[2]   THOUGHT, LANGUAGE, AND COMMUNICATION DISORDERS .1. CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT, DEFINITION OF TERMS, AND EVALUATION OF THEIR RELIABILITY [J].
ANDREASEN, NC .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1979, 36 (12) :1315-1321
[3]  
ANDREASEN NC, 1992, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V49, P615
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Language Universals and Linguistics Tipology
[5]  
Baayen R.H., 2008, ANAL LINGUISTIC DATA, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511801686, 10.1017/CBO9780511801686]
[6]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[7]   Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths [J].
Bedi G. ;
Carrillo F. ;
Cecchi G.A. ;
Slezak D.F. ;
Sigman M. ;
Mota N.B. ;
Ribeiro S. ;
Javitt D.C. ;
Copelli M. ;
Corcoran C.M. .
npj Schizophrenia, 1 (1)
[8]  
Benoit K., 2018, J OPEN SOURCE SOFTW, V3, P774, DOI DOI 10.21105/JOSS.00774
[9]  
Bourgonje P., 2018, Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, V8, P163
[10]   How do we use language? Shared patterns in the frequency of word use across 17 world languages [J].
Calude, Andreea S. ;
Pagel, Mark .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 366 (1567) :1101-1107