Assessing environmental impacts of response strategies for sustainable food system transformation

被引:2
作者
Yang, Jing [1 ]
Gao, Lei [2 ]
Liu, Qi [1 ]
Guo, Zhaoxia [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[2] CSIRO, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
environmental impacts; integrated assessment; response strategies; SDGs; sustainable food system; system dynamics; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LAND-USE; SECURITY; SCENARIOS; COUNTRIES; PATHWAYS; CONSEQUENCES; BIODIVERSITY; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1002/sd.2795
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The global food system is recognized as the largest source of pressure on the Earth's stability, and there is a pressing need for a swift global transformation toward a sustainable food system, which is also crucial for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement goals. While various response strategies have been developed to achieve the sustainable food system, it remains unclear how different response strategies and their combinations interactively affect global environmental functions. Here, we use a system dynamics-based integrated assessment model to quantitatively assess the effects of five representative response strategies, which are well-recognized to be potential for achieving a sustainable food system, and their combinations on the global environment. We use six boundary indicators, corresponding to six key Earth system processes and indicating the safe-operating spaces of the global food system, to define the global environmental performance. Our results show that the effects of response strategies may have a synergistic effect or counterbalance. While some individual strategies are sufficient to maintain certain boundary indicators within their safe zones, only the combination of all strategies can simultaneously prevent all boundary indicators from entering high-risk zones. More coordinated solutions within and outside the global food system are required to restore all boundary indicators to their safe zones.
引用
收藏
页码:2435 / 2453
页数:19
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Urbanization, livestock systems and food security in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature
    Abu Hatab, Assem
    Cavinato, Maria Eduarda Rigo
    Lagerkvist, Carl Johan
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2019, 11 (02) : 279 - 299
  • [2] Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use?
    Alexander, Peter
    Brown, Calum
    Arneth, Almut
    Dias, Clare
    Finnigan, John
    Moran, Dominic
    Rounsevell, Mark D. A.
    [J]. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 15 : 22 - 32
  • [3] Alexandratos N., 2012, WORLD AGR 2030 2050, DOI 10.22004/ag.econ.288998
  • [4] Food system sustainability investigation using system dynamics approach
    Amiri, Alireza
    Mehrjerdi, Yahia Zare
    Jalalimanesh, Ammar
    Sadegheih, Ahmad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 277 (277)
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, Druilhe and Barreiro-Hurle
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2022, FAOSTAT DAT
  • [7] Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5 °C mitigation scenarios
    Bertram, Christoph
    Luderer, Gunnar
    Popp, Alexander
    Minx, Jan Christoph
    Lamb, William F.
    Stevanovic, Miodrag
    Humpenoeder, Florian
    Giannousakis, Anastasis
    Kriegler, Elmar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [8] Resource nexus perspectives towards the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
    Bleischwitz, Raimund
    Spataru, Catalina
    VanDeveer, Stacy D.
    Obersteiner, Michael
    van der Voet, Ester
    Johnson, Corey
    Andrews-Speed, Philip
    Boersma, Tim
    Hoff, Holger
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (12): : 737 - 743
  • [9] Land-use and sustainability under intersecting global change and domestic policy scenarios: Trajectories for Australia to 2050
    Bryan, Brett A.
    Nolan, Martin
    McKellar, Lisa
    Connor, Jeffery D.
    Newth, David
    Harwood, Tom
    King, Darran
    Navarro, Javier
    Cai, Yiyong
    Gao, Lei
    Grundy, Mike
    Graham, Paul
    Ernst, Andreas
    Dunstall, Simon
    Stock, Florian
    Brinsmead, Thomas
    Harman, Ian
    Grigg, Nicola J.
    Battaglia, Michael
    Keating, Brian
    Wonhas, Alex
    Hatfield-Dodds, Steve
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2016, 38 : 130 - 152
  • [10] Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets
    Clark, Michael A.
    Domingo, Nina G. G.
    Colgan, Kimberly
    Thakrar, Sumil K.
    Tilman, David
    Lynch, John
    Azevedo, Ines L.
    Hill, Jason D.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2020, 370 (6517) : 705 - +