Consumers' experiences, preferences, and perceptions of effectiveness in using telehealth for cancer care in Australia

被引:3
作者
Banbury, Annie [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Taylor, Monica [1 ,2 ]
Caffery, Liam [1 ,2 ]
Vartanian, Carolyn Der [4 ]
Haydon, Helen [1 ,2 ]
Mendis, Roshni [1 ,2 ]
Ng, Kawai [4 ]
Smith, Anthony [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Online Hlth, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Ctr Innovat Med Technol, Odense, Denmark
[4] Canc Australia, Sydney, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Ctr Online Hlth, Ground Floor,Bldg 33, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
关键词
cancer; consumers; oncology; telehealth; COVID-19; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/ajco.14002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AimCOVID-19 accelerated telehealth (video and telephone) use for cancer care to reduce disease exposure and transmission. Understanding consumers' health service delivery needs is required to sustain telehealth activity and develop new models of care. We explored consumers' experiences of telehealth in cancer care and their perspectives on improving and sustaining telehealth uptake in the future.MethodsExploratory design mixed-methods study using the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST) framework. Consumers affected by cancer completed an online survey and semistructured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square. Qualitative data from the MAST consumer domain were thematically analyzed.ResultsThere were 1162 survey respondents and 18 interview participants. Video and telephone were used in cancer care with various providers. Telephone was used more frequently. Most respondents (85%) had reliable internet connections for video, however, 36% were not offered a video consultation. Video compared with telephone users were statistically significantly more likely to be satisfied with the quality of their treatment and perceived their consultation achieved as much as an in-person consultation. Telephone users (51%) compared with video users (31%) were more likely to perceive their concerns would have been better understood by their care provider if they were seen in person. Five themes emerged from the qualitative data. Consumers want modality choice, video provides superior experiences versus telephone, consultation mode preference is fluid, and consultation scheduling and administration need further consideration.ConclusionConsumers support telehealth in cancer care. Consumers want consultation mode choices based on their needs and purpose of consultation. Consumers affected by cancer are most likely to have telehealth consultations by telephone even though they have the technology and are more likely to be satisfied with video consultations. Consumers want a choice of consultation modality depending on their needs throughout their cancer treatment and care.image
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 761
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [11] Telehealth in cancer care: during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic
    Burbury, Kate
    Wong, Zee-Wan
    Yip, Desmond
    Thomas, Huw
    Brooks, Peter
    Gilham, Leslie
    Piper, Amanda
    Solo, Ilana
    Underhill, Craig
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2021, 51 (01) : 125 - 133
  • [12] The Breast Cancer Patient Experience of Telemedicine During COVID-19
    Cadili, Lina
    DeGirolamo, Kristin
    Ma, Crystal Suet-Ying
    Chen, Leo
    McKevitt, Elaine
    Pao, Jin-Si
    Dingee, Carol
    Bazzarelli, Amy
    Warburton, Rebecca
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : 2244 - 2252
  • [13] Patient and Provider-Reported Satisfaction of Cancer Rehabilitation Telemedicine Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Chang, Philip J.
    Jay, Gina M.
    Kalpakjian, Claire
    Andrews, Cody
    Smith, Sean
    [J]. PM&R, 2021, 13 (12) : 1362 - 1368
  • [14] Analysis of the Implementation of Telehealth Visits for Care of Patients With Cancer in Houston During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Darcourt, Jorge G.
    Aparicio, Kalia
    Dorsey, Phillip M.
    Ensor, Joe E.
    Zsigmond, Eva M.
    Wong, Stephen T.
    Ezeana, Chika F.
    Puppala, Mamta
    Heyne, Kirk E.
    Geyer, Charles E.
    Phillips, Robert A.
    Schwartz, Roberta L.
    Chang, Jenny C.
    [J]. JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 17 (01) : 35 - +
  • [15] Specialist consultation activity and costs in Australia: Before and after the introduction of COVID-19 telehealth funding
    De Guzman, Keshia R.
    Caffery, Liam J.
    Smith, Anthony C.
    Snoswell, Centaine L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2021, 27 (10) : 609 - 614
  • [16] Cancer care disruption and reorganisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: A patient, carer and healthcare worker perspective
    Edge, Rhiannon
    Meyers, Josh
    Tiernan, Gabriella
    Li, Zhicheng
    Schiavuzzi, Alexandra
    Chan, Priscilla
    Vassallo, Amy
    Morrow, April
    Mazariego, Carolyn
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Canfell, Karen
    Taylor, Natalie
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [17] Telehealth in the Context of COVID-19: Changing Perspectives in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States
    Fisk, Malcolm
    Livingstone, Anne
    Pit, Sabrina Winona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (06)
  • [18] Cancer care in a time of COVID: lung cancer patient's experience of telehealth and connectedness
    Fraser, Anne
    McNeill, Rob
    Robinson, Jackie
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (02) : 1823 - 1830
  • [19] Medical Oncology Patient Perceptions of Telehealth Video Visits
    Granberg, Rachel E.
    Heyer, Arianna
    Rising, Kristin L.
    Handley, Nathan R.
    Gentsch, Alexzandra T.
    Binder, Adam F.
    [J]. JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 17 (09) : 574 - +
  • [20] Telehealth in radiation oncology at the Townsville Cancer Centre: Service evaluation and patient satisfaction
    Hamilton, Elizabeth
    Van Veldhuizen, Ellie
    Brown, Amy
    Brennan, Sean
    Sabesan, Sabe
    [J]. CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 : 20 - 25