Regional Diversity and Evolution of Agricultural Labor Productivity in China

被引:7
作者
Xu, Biaowen [1 ]
Tu, Jiayin [2 ]
Kai, Wang [2 ]
Chen, Xueli [3 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Econ & Sci Informat, Fuzhou 350003, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Inst Journalism & Commun, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF CHINESE HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT | 2023年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Agricultural labor productivity; Regional disparity; Dynamic evolution; Convergence; Land resource; GROWTH; CONVERGENCE; TRANSITION;
D O I
10.47297/wspchrmWSP2040-800504.20231401
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Analyzing the regional diversity and convergence of agricultural labor productivity is an important step in investigating this aspect of the economy. To enhance urban-rural integration, the Gini coefficient and kernel density estimation methods are used to examine regional agricultural labor productivity in China. The overall regional diversity in agricultural labor productivity is found to be expanding, with regional differences being the primary source of the overall disparity. Agricultural labor productivity in China has continued to improve over the period considered in this study. The gap between agricultural labor productivity in the eastern and western regions is found to be lower than that between the eastern and central regions and the western and central regions. Although there is no & sigma; -convergence to agricultural labor productivity in China, both absolute and conditional & beta; -convergence are observed. A spatial lag model indicates that agricultural labor productivity has a significant positive spillover effect. GDP per capita and the level of marketization make significant contributions to the convergence of agricultural labor productivity, and the level of industrialization significantly reduces the agricultural labor productivity gap.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 105
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] TRANSPORTATION COSTS, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY, AND CROSS-COUNTRY INCOME DIFFERENCES
    Adamopoulos, Tasso
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 52 (02) : 489 - 521
  • [2] Government Expenditures, Health Outcomes and Marginal Productivity of Agricultural Inputs: The Case of Tanzania
    Allen, Summer
    Badiane, Ousmane
    Sene, Ligane
    Ulimwengu, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 65 (03) : 637 - 662
  • [3] Agriculture in the Global Economy
    Alston, Julian M.
    Pardey, Philip G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 28 (01) : 121 - 146
  • [4] Structural Change Out of Agriculture: Labor Push versus Labor Pull
    Alvarez-Cuadrado, Francisco
    Poschke, Markus
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2011, 3 (03) : 127 - 158
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, GLOBAL EC PROSPECTS, DOI [10.1596/978-1-4648-1553-9, 10.1596/978-1-4648-1553-9_ch1, DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-1553-9_CH1]
  • [6] Are small farms really more productive than large farms?
    Aragon, Fernando M.
    Restuccia, Diego
    Rud, Juan Pablo
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2022, 106
  • [7] Has agricultural labor restructuring improved agricultural labor productivity in China? A decomposition approach
    Balezentis, Tomas
    Li, Tianxiang
    Chen, Xueli
    [J]. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2021, 76
  • [8] Bhattarai K., 2022, Journal of Economic Asymmetries, V25, pe00247, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2022.e00247, DOI 10.1016/J.JECA.2022.E00247]
  • [9] Cuerva MC, 2012, AGROCIENCIA-MEXICO, V46, P621
  • [10] CAPITAL OBSOLESCENCE AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY
    Caunedo, Julieta
    Keller, Elisa
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2021, 136 (01) : 505 - 561