Supervisory forward guidance: the effectiveness of the 2020 euro area supervisory capital relief on the bank credit supply channel

被引:1
作者
Oprica, Silviu [1 ]
Schwarz, Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] European Cent Bank ECB, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Pandemic support measures; Microprudential measures effectiveness; Supervisory forward guidance; Bank credit supply; Large corporates; Lending; MONETARY-POLICY; REQUIREMENTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1057/s41261-022-00212-5
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate the effectiveness of the euro area's single supervisory mechanism's capital relief measures in response to the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, in terms of large non-financial corporations' lending outcomes. Using a granular borrower level dataset and controlling for the policies of other euro area authorities, bank characteristics and demand effects, we find that the lifting of the pillar 2 guidance (P2G) capital recommendation had a considerable statistically significant impact in supporting bank credit supply. The results are attributed to both, the capital made available and announcement effects. The latter are generated by the communication of supervisory plans and the fact the P2G was not designed to be ex ante "releasable ". The announcement of granted supervisory flexibility seems to have reduced uncertainty surrounding forthcoming regulatory responses in the beginning of the pandemic and acted as a de facto "supervisory forward guidance " in support of bank business decisions. Going forward we propose the creation of a formal supervisory forward guidance strategy, to complement the existing communication channels, to the benefit of banks' and market participants' decision making during both normal and crisis times. Our work therefore contributes to the literature threefold: (i) it introduces a novel granular supervisory dataset at the borrower level, (ii) it is one of the first papers to take a euro area supervisory perspective in analysing the effectiveness of capital relief measures at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, and (iii) it proposes a new supervisory policy instrument, the "supervisory forward guidance " with the goal of informing and steering banks' and market participants' expectations in order to prevent distress episodes.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 41
页数:22
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Whatever It Takes: The Real Effects of Unconventional Monetary Policy [J].
Acharya, Viral V. ;
Eisert, Tim ;
Eufinger, Christian ;
Hirsch, Christian .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2019, 32 (09) :3366-3411
[2]   Real Effects of the Sovereign Debt Crisis in Europe: Evidence from Syndicated Loans [J].
Acharya, Viral V. ;
Eisert, Tim ;
Eufinger, Christian ;
Hirsch, Christian .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2018, 31 (08) :2855-2896
[3]   How does credit supply respond to monetary policy and bank minimum capital requirements? [J].
Aiyar, Shekhar ;
Calomiris, Charles W. ;
Wieladek, Tomasz .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 82 :142-165
[4]   The international transmission of bank capital requirements: Evidence from the UK [J].
Aiyar, Shekhar ;
Calomiris, Charles W. ;
Hooley, John ;
Korniyenko, Yevgeniya ;
Wieladek, Tomasz .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 113 (03) :368-382
[5]  
Anderson J., 2020, BRUEGEL BLOG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ECB Bank Lending Survey
[7]  
Ayadi R., 2020, EMEA Policy Paper, P1
[8]   Procyclical Capital Regulation and Lending [J].
Behn, Markus ;
Haselmann, Rainer ;
Wachtel, Paul .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2016, 71 (02) :919-956
[9]  
Berrospide JM, 2010, INT J CENT BANK, V6, P5
[10]  
Beyer A., 2017, ECB OCCASIONAL PAPER