Can importing improve the energy efficiency? Theory and evidence from Chinese industrial firms

被引:13
作者
He, Ling-Yun [1 ]
Huang, Geng [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Coll Econ, Guangzhou 510632, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy efficiency; Innovation investment; Sustainable development; Importing; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; INTERMEDIATE INPUTS; PRODUCTIVITY; EXPORT; PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENT; INNOVATION; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2022.09.003
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Importing is an important method to connect the domestic market with international market. By importing energy resources to replace parts of domestic production, a country's energy pressure has been alleviated to a certain extent, but does importing really improve a country's energy efficiency? This issue is extremely important both in theory and in practice. Thus, in this paper, we first establish a micro theoretical trade model to analyze the impacts of importing on firms' energy efficiency. Then, based on the data of China's industrial firms, this paper systematically identifies the causal effect of firms' importing behavior on their energy efficiency by using Propensity Score Matching-Difference (PSM-DID) in differences method. The results show that firms' importing behavior can significantly improve their energy efficiency, and this positive effect has a certain persistence in time. At the same time, the further mechanism test shows that importing can significantly increase firms' innovation investment and improve firms' productivity, thus importing can improve firms' energy efficiency through innovation investment effect and productivity effect. This paper verifies that importing can improve firms' energy efficiency, and reveals the importance of importing on a country's development from the perspective of energy resources and environment. This paper helps to provide relevant policy reference for the formulation and adjustment of the country's foreign trade policy.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 469
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Alp, Harun ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Kerr, William .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 108 (11) :3450-3491
[2]   Does corporate R&D investment affect firm environmental performance? Evidence from G-6 countries [J].
Alam, Md. Samsul ;
Atif, Muhammad ;
Chien-Chi, Chu ;
Soytas, Ugur .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 78 :401-411
[3]   Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia [J].
Amiti, Mary ;
Konings, Jozef .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (05) :1611-1638
[4]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[5]   R&D Investment, Exporting, and Productivity Dynamics [J].
Aw, Bee Yan ;
Roberts, Mark J. ;
Xu, Daniel Yi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (04) :1312-1344
[6]   Input-trade liberalization, export prices and quality upgrading [J].
Bas, Maria ;
Strauss-Kahn, Vanessa .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 95 (02) :250-262
[7]   Employment protection and labor productivity [J].
Bjuggren, Carl Magnus .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2018, 157 :138-157
[8]   Modern Management: Good for the Environment or Just Hot Air? [J].
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Genakos, Christos ;
Martin, Ralf ;
Sadun, Raffaella .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2010, 120 (544) :551-572
[9]   Firms in International Trade: Importers' and Exporters' Heterogeneity in Italian Manufacturing Industry [J].
Castellani, Davide ;
Serti, Francesco ;
Tomasi, Chiara .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2010, 33 (03) :424-457
[10]   Trade liberalization and the environment: Evidence from NAFTA and US manufacturing [J].
Cherniwchan, Jevan .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 105 :130-149