Graduate student experiences of engineering education research in Canada

被引:0
作者
Cicek, Jillian Seniuk [1 ]
Paul, Robyn [2 ]
Sheridan, Patricia [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Price Fac Engn, Ctr Engn Profess Practice & Engn Educ, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Schulich Sch Engn, Sustainable Syst Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Studies Transdisciplinary Engn Educ & Practic, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Troost Inst Leadership Educ Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Engineering education research; graduate student identity; Identity Trajectory Framework; exploratory; qualitative; DISCIPLINE; SCHOLARSHIP; CLIMATE; FACULTY; GENDER;
D O I
10.1080/03043797.2024.2309166
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In Canada, formal structures for advancing engineering education research (EER), including graduate programmes, funding, and career pathways, are uncommon. However, an active informal EER community exists. Using the Identity Trajectory Framework, we designed an exploratory basic interpretive qualitative study to learn how 21 graduate students experienced EER in Canada. EER's dualist internal identity and lack of external identity, credibility, and structural support create a feedback loop of uncertainties for graduate students trying to navigate EER. This inhibits the healthy development of EER as an academic discipline, and thereby, the healthy development of EER graduate students. If we want to successfully support graduate students in developing their identity as EER researchers, we need institutional structures. Understanding how graduate students experience EER in Canada is important to understand how to build capacity here and in other locales where the field is newly developing.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1063
页数:29
相关论文
共 114 条
[91]   Researchers Explore Their Roles as Participant-Researchers in Characterizing the Lived Experiences of Graduate Students in Engineering Education Research in Canada: a Collaborative Autoethnography [J].
Seniuk Cicek, Jillian ;
Paul, Robyn ;
Sheridan, Patricia K. ;
Kuley, Liz .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE MATHEMATICS AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01) :98-115
[92]   The Changing Landscape of Doctoral Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: PhD Students, Faculty Advisors, and Preferences for Varied Career Options [J].
Sherman, David K. ;
Ortosky, Lauren ;
Leong, Suyi ;
Kello, Christopher ;
Hegarty, Mary .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
[93]   Narrative survey: A methodology for studying multiple populations [J].
Shkedi, A .
NARRATIVE INQUIRY, 2004, 14 (01) :87-111
[94]  
Shulman L., 1999, Change, V31, P10, DOI [10.1080/00091389909604218, 10.1080/00091389909602695, DOI 10.1080/00091389909602695, DOI 10.1080/00091389909604218]
[95]  
Siddiqui JA, 2016, INT J ENG EDUC, V32, P2352
[96]   Linking life histories and mental health: A person-centered strategy [J].
Singer, B ;
Ryff, CD ;
Carr, D ;
Magee, WJ .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, VOL. 28 1998, 1998, 28 :1-51
[97]   Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering [J].
Singer, Susan ;
Smith, Karl A. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2013, 102 (04) :468-471
[98]  
Streveler R.A., 2007, To Improve the Academy, V1, P139, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.2334-4822.2007.TB00479.X
[99]  
Streveler R. A., 2015, P IEEE FRONT ED C FI, P1, DOI [10.1109/FIE.2015.7344303, DOI 10.1109/FIE.2015.7344303]
[100]   Conducting rigorous research in engineering education [J].
Streveler, Ruth A. ;
Smith, Karl A. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2006, 95 (02) :103-105