Graduate student experiences of engineering education research in Canada

被引:0
作者
Cicek, Jillian Seniuk [1 ]
Paul, Robyn [2 ]
Sheridan, Patricia [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Price Fac Engn, Ctr Engn Profess Practice & Engn Educ, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Schulich Sch Engn, Sustainable Syst Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Studies Transdisciplinary Engn Educ & Practic, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Troost Inst Leadership Educ Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Engineering education research; graduate student identity; Identity Trajectory Framework; exploratory; qualitative; DISCIPLINE; SCHOLARSHIP; CLIMATE; FACULTY; GENDER;
D O I
10.1080/03043797.2024.2309166
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In Canada, formal structures for advancing engineering education research (EER), including graduate programmes, funding, and career pathways, are uncommon. However, an active informal EER community exists. Using the Identity Trajectory Framework, we designed an exploratory basic interpretive qualitative study to learn how 21 graduate students experienced EER in Canada. EER's dualist internal identity and lack of external identity, credibility, and structural support create a feedback loop of uncertainties for graduate students trying to navigate EER. This inhibits the healthy development of EER as an academic discipline, and thereby, the healthy development of EER graduate students. If we want to successfully support graduate students in developing their identity as EER researchers, we need institutional structures. Understanding how graduate students experience EER in Canada is important to understand how to build capacity here and in other locales where the field is newly developing.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1063
页数:29
相关论文
共 114 条
  • [1] Adams, 2006, 2006 ASEE ANN C EXP, DOI [10.18260/1-2-1003, DOI 10.18260/1-2-1003]
  • [2] Adams R., 2007, P IN INT C RES ENG E
  • [3] Adams R., 2014, ASEE ANN C EXPOSITIO, DOI [10.18260/1-2-19923, DOI 10.18260/1-2-19923]
  • [4] Allendoerfer C., 2007, AM ED RES ASS AERA A, V17
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, BIG ENG ED MEET
  • [6] An ethnographic study of an engineering community: Mentoring as a tacit rule and its implications for how people learn
    Ayar, Mehmet C.
    Yalvac, Bugrahan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2022, 111 (02) : 400 - 419
  • [7] Inequity in graduate engineering identity: Disciplinary differences and opportunity structures
    Bahnson, Matthew
    Perkins, Heather
    Tsugawa, Marissa
    Satterfield, Derrick
    Parker, Mackenzie
    Cass, Cheryl
    Kirn, Adam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2021, 110 (04) : 949 - 976
  • [8] Confusions and Conventions: Qualitative Research in Engineering Education
    Baillie, Caroline
    Douglas, Elliot P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2014, 103 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [9] Using peer reviews to examine micropolitics and disciplinary development of engineering education: a case study
    Beddoes, Kacey
    [J]. DISCOURSE-STUDIES IN THE CULTURAL POLITICS OF EDUCATION, 2014, 35 (02) : 266 - 277
  • [10] Bernhard J., 2018, P RES ENG ED S REES