Optimized Adaptive Iterative Sparse Principal Component Analysis Methodology for Fault Detection and Identification in Control Valves

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Jiaxin [1 ]
Samavedham, Lakshminarayanan [2 ]
Rangaiah, Gade Pandu [2 ]
Dong, Lichun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Singapore, Singapore
来源
2023 62ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE SOCIETY OF INSTRUMENT AND CONTROL ENGINEERS, SICE | 2023年
关键词
Principal component analysis; Optimized adaptive iteration sparsity; Process monitoring; QUANTITATIVE MODEL;
D O I
10.23919/SICE59929.2023.10354220
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), modern industrial fault diagnosis has become a prominent area of research. Among them, PCA-based fault diagnosis has been widely applied across various industrial domains. However, the rapid progress in the industrial sector has revealed limitations of PCA in handling dynamic and time-varying data, rendering it unsuitable for deployment in industrial process control applications. The progress in machine learning and artificial intelligence has paved the way for the appropriate extension of traditional methods, expanding their practical applications in the real world. This paper presents an optimized adaptive iterative sparse PCA (OAISPCA) approach. By iteratively updating the sparse penalty term through an interior point-based method, adaptive sparsity is introduced into the original PCA method, thereby enhancing model interpretability and fault diagnosis accuracy. The effectiveness and advantages of this method are validated through its application to real-world industrial control valve data. The results demonstrate that OAISPCA significantly improves performance metrics such as fault detection rate (FDR) and false alarm rate (FAR).
引用
收藏
页码:1475 / 1480
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring
    Alcala, Carlos F.
    Qin, S. Joe
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 2009, 45 (07) : 1593 - 1600
  • [2] A bibliometric review of process safety and risk analysis
    Amin, Md Tanjin
    Khan, Faisal
    Amyotte, Paul
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 126 : 366 - 381
  • [3] Bartys M, 2002, Using DAMADICS actuator
  • [4] Distributed PCA Model for Plant-Wide Process Monitoring
    Ge, Zhiqiang
    Song, Zhihuan
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2013, 52 (05) : 1947 - 1957
  • [5] Sparse modeling and monitoring for industrial processes using sparse, distributed principal component analysis
    Huang, Jian
    Yang, Xu
    Shardt, Yuri A. W.
    Yan, Xuefeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TAIWAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2021, 122 : 14 - 22
  • [6] PCA-ICA Integrated with Bayesian Method for Non-Gaussian Fault Diagnosis
    Jiang, Qingchao
    Yan, Xuefeng
    Li, Juan
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2016, 55 (17) : 4979 - 4986
  • [7] Compressive sparse principal component analysis for process supervisory monitoring and fault detection
    Liu, Yang
    Zhang, Guoshan
    Xu, Bingyin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2017, 50 : 1 - 10
  • [8] A review of process fault detection and diagnosis Part III: Process history based methods
    Venkatasubramanian, V
    Rengaswamy, R
    Kavuri, SN
    Yin, K
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 27 (03) : 327 - 346
  • [9] A review of process fault detection and diagnosis Part II: Quantitative model and search strategies
    Venkatasubramanian, V
    Rengaswamy, R
    Kavuri, SN
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 27 (03) : 313 - 326
  • [10] A review of process fault detection and diagnosis Part I: Quantitative model-based methods
    Venkatsubramanian, V
    Rengaswamy, R
    Yin, K
    Kavuri, SN
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 27 (03) : 293 - 311