Laparoscopic cholecystectomy critical view of safety (LC-CVS): a multi-national validation study of an objective, procedure-specific assessment using video-based assessment (VBA)

被引:2
作者
Adrales, Gina [1 ]
Ardito, Francesco [2 ]
Chowbey, Pradeep [3 ]
Morales-Conde, Salvador [4 ]
Ferreres, Alberto R. [5 ]
Hensman, Chrys [6 ]
Martin, David [7 ]
Matthaei, Hanno [8 ]
Ramshaw, Bruce [9 ,14 ]
Roberts, J. Keith [10 ]
Schrem, Harald [11 ]
Sharma, Anil [3 ]
Tabiri, Stephen [12 ]
Vibert, Eric [13 ]
Woods, Michael S. [14 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, 600 N Wolfe St,Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Catholic Univ, Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Hepatobiliary Surg Unit, Rome, Italy
[3] Max Super Specialty Hosp, Inst Laparoscop Endoscop & Bariatr Surg, New Delhi, India
[4] Univ Seville, Univ Hosp Virgen Rocio, Unit Innovat Minimally Invas Surg, Seville, Spain
[5] Univ Buenos Aires, Dept Surg, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Surg & LapSurgery, Melbourne, Australia
[7] Univ Minnesota, Div Crit Care Acute Care Surg, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Bonn, Germany
[9] CQInsights PBC, Knoxville, TN USA
[10] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Trust, Liver Transplant & HPB Surg, Birmingham, England
[11] Med Univ Graz, Gen Visceral & Transplant Surg, Graz, Austria
[12] Tamale Teaching Hosp, Univ Dev Studies, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Tamales, Ghana
[13] Hop Paul Brousse, AP HP, Ctr Hepato Biliaire, Villejuif, France
[14] Caresyntax Corp, Boston, MA USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 38卷 / 02期
关键词
Competency-based education; Objective procedure-specific assessment; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical training; Critical view of safety; Video-based assessment; ENTRUSTABLE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES; STRUCTURED ASSESSMENT; TECHNICAL SKILLS; RELIABILITY; COMPETENCE; VALIDITY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-023-10479-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundA novel 6-item objective, procedure-specific assessment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy incorporating the critical view of safety (LC-CVS OPSA) was developed to support trainee formative and summative assessments. The LC-CVS OPSA included two retraction items (fundus and infundibulum retraction) and four CVS items (hepatocystic triangle visualization, gallbladder-liver separation, cystic artery identification, and cystic duct identification). The scoring rubric for retraction consisted of poor (frequently outside of defined range), adequate (minimally outside of defined range) and excellent (consistently inside defined range) and for CVS items were "poor-unsafe", "adequate-safe", or "excellent-safe".MethodsA multi-national consortium of 12 expert LC surgeons applied the OPSA-LC CVS to 35 unique LC videos and one duplicate video. Primary outcome measure was inter-rater reliability as measured by Gwet's AC2, a weighted measure that adjusts for scales with high probability of random agreement. Analysis of the inter-rater reliability was conducted on a collapsed dichotomous scoring rubric of "poor-unsafe" vs. "adequate/excellent-safe".ResultsInter-rater reliability was high for all six items ranging from 0.76 (hepatocystic triangle visualization) to 0.86 (cystic duct identification). Intra-rater reliability for the single duplicate video was substantially higher across the six items ranging from 0.91 to 1.00.ConclusionsThe novel 6-item OPSA LC CVS demonstrated high inter-rater reliability when tested with a multi-national consortium of LC expert surgeons. This brief instrument focused on safe surgical practice was designed to support the implementation of entrustable professional activities into busy surgical training programs. Instrument use coupled with video-based assessments creates novel datasets with the potential for artificial intelligence development including computer vision to drive assessment automation.
引用
收藏
页码:922 / 930
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Adrales G, 2023, UNSAFE SCORE LAPAROS
  • [2] American Board of Surgery, 2022, ENTRUSTABLE PROFESSI
  • [3] Surgical treatment and outcome of iatrogenic bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy and the impact of different clinical classification systems
    Bektas, H.
    Schrem, H.
    Winny, M.
    Klempnauerl, J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (09) : 1119 - 1127
  • [4] Development of a Standardized Training Course for Laparoscopic Procedures Using Delphi Methodology
    Bethlehem, Martijn S.
    Kramp, Kelvin H.
    van Det, Marc J.
    Hoedemaker, Henk O. ten Cate
    Veeger, Nicolaas J. G. M.
    Pierie, Jean Pierre E. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 71 (06) : 810 - 816
  • [5] Blood E., 2007, SAS GLOBAL FORUM 200
  • [6] Entrustable Professional Activities in General Surgery: Development and Implementation
    Brasel, Karen J.
    Klingensmith, Mary E.
    Englander, Robert
    Grambau, Marni
    Buyske, Jo
    Sarosi, George
    Minter, Rebecca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 76 (05) : 1174 - 1186
  • [7] Brunt LM, 2020, SURG ENDOSC, V34, P2827, DOI [10.1007/s00464-020-07568-7, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003791]
  • [8] Caresyntax, 2023, PLATFORM
  • [9] Effective Teaching and Feedback Strategies in the OR and Beyond
    Champagne, Bradley J.
    [J]. CLINICS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2013, 26 (04) : 244 - 249
  • [10] Implementation and validation of a competency assessment tool for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Chevallay, Mickael
    Liot, Emilie
    Fournier, Ian
    Abbassi, Ziad
    Peloso, Andrea
    Hagen, Monika E.
    Moenig, Stefan P.
    Morel, Philippe
    Toso, Christian
    Buchs, Nicolas
    Miskovic, Danilo
    Ris, Frederic
    Jung, Minoa K.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (11): : 8261 - 8269