In critical need of research-based instructional strategies and assessment: an investigation of ePCR math lesson plans for middle school students

被引:0
作者
Jin, Yi [1 ]
Zha, Shenghua [2 ]
Cowart, Janet [1 ]
机构
[1] Kennesaw State Univ, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
[2] Univ S Alabama, Mobile, AL USA
关键词
21st-century skills; assessment; computational thinking; ePCR; instructional strategies; math lesson plans; COMPUTATIONAL THINKING; EDUCATIONAL ROBOTICS; GAME DESIGN; INTEGRATION; KNOWLEDGE; TECHNOLOGY; BELIEFS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/15391523.2023.2232900
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
One favored approach to teaching computational thinking (CT) and coding skills in PK-12 computer science education is to use educational physical computing and robotics devices (ePCRs). Marrying the physical functionalities and computer coding possibilities, ePCRs show great promise in cultivating PK-12 students' CT and 21-st century skills. However, in practice, there is a lack of experienced teachers and readily-available ePCR curricula, which poses challenges in classroom integration. Thus, the purpose of this article is to analyze publicly-available ePCR math lesson plans designed for middle school students, especially focusing on lesson characteristics, instructional strategies, assessment plans, and 21st-century skills cultivated. After analyzing 283 publicly-available ePCR math lesson plans, we found that they used a variety of educational technologies. In particular, the majority utilize physical coding and the tools' functionalities to move, draw, show visuals, and play audio. However, most of the lesson plans are in critical need of research-based instructional strategies and assessment plans and instruments. Our empirical evidence warrants a great need for additional research, design, and professional development in the area of effectively integrating ePCRs into content areas, especially in the aspects of active learning strategies, student-centered assessment, and more profound pedagogies to cultivate students' 21st-century skills.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 374
页数:24
相关论文
共 92 条
[41]  
Karim MohammadEhsanul., 2015, 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/ARSO.2015.7428217
[42]   The Effect of a Classroom-Based Intensive Robotics and Programming Workshop on Sequencing Ability in Early Childhood [J].
Kazakoff E.R. ;
Sullivan A. ;
Bers M.U. .
Early Childhood Education Journal, 2013, 41 (4) :245-255
[43]   Analyzing children's computational thinking through embodied interaction with technology: a multimodal perspective [J].
Kopcha, Theodore J. ;
Ocak, Ceren ;
Qian, Yingxiao .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 69 (04) :1987-2012
[44]  
Kyu Han Koh, 2010, Proceedings 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC 2010), P59, DOI 10.1109/VLHCC.2010.17
[45]   Computational thinking for youth in practice [J].
Lee I. ;
Martin F. ;
Denner J. ;
Coulter B. ;
Allan W. ;
Erickson J. ;
Malyn-Smith J. ;
Werner L. .
ACM Inroads, 2011, 2 (01) :32-37
[46]  
Leonard J., 2019, Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, V5, P101, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S40751-018-0048-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-018-0048-1]
[47]   Using Robotics and Game Design to Enhance Children's Self-Efficacy, STEM Attitudes, and Computational Thinking Skills [J].
Leonard, Jacqueline ;
Buss, Alan ;
Gamboa, Ruben ;
Mitchell, Monica ;
Fashola, Olatokunbo S. ;
Hubert, Tarcia ;
Almughyirah, Sultan .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 25 (06) :860-876
[48]  
Lockwood E., 2016, 38 ANN M N AM CHAPT
[49]   Communicating computational concepts and practices within high school students' portfolios of making electronic textiles [J].
Lui, Debora ;
Walker, Justice T. ;
Hanna, Sheri ;
Kafai, Yasmin B. ;
Fields, Deborah ;
Jayathirtha, Gayithri .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2020, 28 (03) :284-301
[50]   Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? [J].
Lye, Sze Yee ;
Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 41 :51-61