Different doses of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Deng, Jia [1 ]
Zeng, Xinglin [2 ]
Hu, Wenting [1 ]
Yue, Tinghui [1 ]
Luo, Zicheng [1 ]
Zeng, Lian [1 ]
Li, Ping [3 ]
Chen, Jiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Coll Clin Med, Guiyang, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Coll Clin Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Guizhou Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Colorectal & Anal Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 71 Baoshan North Rd, Guiyang 550001, Peoples R China
关键词
Bevacizumab; Chemotherapy; Advanced colorectal cancer; Meta-analysis; Bayesian analysis; OXALIPLATIN-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; PLUS BEVACIZUMAB; PHASE-II; OPEN-LABEL; FLUOROURACIL; LEUCOVORIN; CAPECITABINE; EFFICACY; FOLFIRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04442-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to explore the incremental benefit of bevacizumab (Bev) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) with different doses.MethodsA literature search of eight electronic databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang databases, Chinese Biomedical Database, VIP medicine information, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE) was conducted from database creation to December 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared Bev at various dosages + chemotherapy (CT) versus placebo (or blank control) + CT were selected. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), and grade >= 3 adverse events (AEs) were integrated first by pooled analysis. The likelihood of ideal dosage of Bev was then ranked using random effects within Bayesian analysis.ResultsTwenty-six RCTs involving 18,261 patients met the inclusion criteria. OS increased significantly after using 5 mg (HR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.00) and 10 mg dosages of Bev (HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.85) with CT, but statistical significance was not attained for the 7.5 mg dose (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08). A significantly increased in PFS with doses of 5 mg (HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.83), 7.5 mg (HR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.00), and 10 mg (HR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.68). ORR distinctly increased after 5 mg (RR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.55), 7.5 mg (RR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.50), and10 mg (RR: 2.27, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.84) doses were administered. Grade >= 3 AEs increased clearly in 5 mg (RR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.20) compared to 7.5 mg (RR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.35) and 10 mg (RR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.36). Bayesian analysis demonstrated that 10 mg Bev obtained the maximum time of OS (HR: 0.75, 95% CrI 0.58 to 0.97; probability rank = 0.05) indirectly compared to 5 mg and 7.5 mg Bev. Compared with 5 mg and 7.5 mg Bev, 10 mg Bev also holds the longest duration for PFS (HR: 0.59, 95% CrI 0.43 to 0.82; probability rank = 0.00). In terms of ORR, 10 mg Bev holds the maximum frequency (RR: 2.02, 95% CrI 1.52 to 2.66; probability rank = 0.98) in comparison to 5 mg and 7.5 mg Bev clearly. For grade >= 3 AEs, 10 mg Bev has the maximum incidence (RR: 1.15, 95% CrI 0.95 to 1.40, probability rank = 0.67) in comparison to other doses of Bev.ConclusionThe study suggests that 10 mg dose Bev could be more effective in treating advanced CRC in efficacy, but 5 mg Bev could be more safer in terms of safety.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Different doses of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis
    Jia Deng
    Xinglin Zeng
    Wenting Hu
    Tinghui Yue
    Zicheng Luo
    Lian Zeng
    Ping Li
    Jiang Chen
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-based maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer A meta-analysis
    Ma, Hongbo
    Wu, Xiaoli
    Tao, Miaomiao
    Tang, Nan
    Li, Yanyan
    Zhang, Xianquan
    Zhou, Qi
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (50)
  • [3] Value of bevacizumab in treatment of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Qu, Chun-Ying
    Zheng, Ying
    Zhou, Min
    Zhang, Yi
    Shen, Feng
    Cao, Jia
    Xu, Lei-Ming
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (16) : 5072 - 5080
  • [4] Risks of hypertension and thromboembolism in patients receiving bevacizumab with chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chitkara, Akshit
    Kaur, Nirmaljot
    Desai, Aditya
    Mehta, Devanshi
    Anamika, Fnu
    Sarkar, Srawani
    Gowda, Nandini
    Sethi, Prabhdeep
    Thawani, Rajat
    Chen, Emerson
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (24): : 21579 - 21591
  • [5] Hypertension as a predictive biomarker for efficacy of bevacizumab treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Cui
    Sun, Peng
    Ye, Sheng
    Weng, Hui-wen
    Dai, Qiang-sheng
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2014, 19 (04): : 917 - 924
  • [6] Bevacizumab in combination with first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Hu, W.
    Xu, W. -S.
    Liao, X. -F.
    He, H. -J.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2015, 70 (06) : 451 - 458
  • [7] The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Hailing
    You, Jinzhi
    Liu, Wei
    Chen, Dandan
    Zhang, Shiqi
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (30) : E26714
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Xiuxing
    Chen, Yanfeng
    Cai, Xiuyu
    Zhang, Dongsheng
    Fan, Lei
    Qiu, Huijuan
    Zhang, Bei
    Guo, Guifang
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 13 (05) : 869 - 877
  • [9] Safety of Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Geiger-Gritsch, Sabine
    Stollenwerk, Bjoern
    Miksad, Rebecca
    Guba, Beate
    Wild, Claudia
    Siebert, Uwe
    ONCOLOGIST, 2010, 15 (11) : 1179 - 1191
  • [10] Efficacy of bevacizumab in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baraniskin, Alexander
    Buchberger, Barbara
    Pox, Christian
    Graeven, Ulli
    Holch, Julian W.
    Schmiegel, Wolff
    Heinemann, Volker
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 106 : 37 - 44