Roundtrip, free-floating and peer-to-peer carsharing: A Bayesian behavioral analysis

被引:8
作者
Ramos, Erika Martins Silva [1 ]
Mattos, David Issa [2 ]
Bergstad, Cecilia Jakobsson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Psychol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Volvo Cars, Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Carsharing; Travel behavior; Bayesian modeling; Bradley-Terry model; Carsharing business models; TRAVEL MODE CHOICE; DECISION-MAKING; BUSINESS MODELS; PAST BEHAVIOR; CAR USE; HABIT; INTENTION; ADOPTION; MOTIVES; USER;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2022.103577
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study analyses behavioral psychological facilitators and barriers to using different carshar-ing business models. It identifies the most preferable carsharing business models for different trip purposes as well as the main motivators for using it. Users of carsharing services (N = 1121) in German cities completed a questionnaire distributed by five operators representing three different business models: free-floating (FF), round-trip station-based (RTSB), and peer-to-peer (P2P). All analyses are performed from a Bayesian perspective and further discussion of the statistical analyses is included. The main results indicate that there are different preferences for carsharing business models depending on the trip purpose, with a trade-off between free-floating and round-trip station-based business models. The peer-to-peer business model stood out for short holiday trips. Age, educational level, and income affected the probability of selecting different carsharing operators. Users of FF and RTSB differ regarding driving habits and trust in the services.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit? [J].
Aarts, H ;
Verplanken, B ;
van Knippenberg, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 28 (15) :1355-1374
[2]   Modelling the determinants of car-sharing adoption intentions among young adults: the role of attitude, perceived benefits, travel expectations and socio-demographic factors [J].
Acheampong, Ransford A. ;
Siiba, Alhassan .
TRANSPORTATION, 2020, 47 (05) :2557-2580
[3]  
Agresti A., 2001, Categorical Data Analysis, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471249688
[4]   Is climate morality the answer? Preconditions affecting the motivation to decrease private car use [J].
Andersson, Alfred .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 78
[5]   Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action [J].
Bamberg, S ;
Ajzen, I ;
Schmidt, P .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 25 (03) :175-187
[6]   Revealing influences on carsharing users? trip distance in small urban areas [J].
Baumgarte, Felix ;
Keller, Robert ;
Rohrich, Felix ;
Valett, Lynne ;
Zinsbacher, Daniela .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 105
[7]   You?ll never share alone: Analyzing carsharing user group behavior [J].
Baumgarte, Felix ;
Brandt, Tobias ;
Keller, Robert ;
Roehrich, Felix ;
Schmidt, Lukas .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 93
[8]   Measuring the car ownership impact of free-floating car-sharing - A case study in Basel, Switzerland [J].
Becker, Henrik ;
Ciari, Francesco ;
Axhausen, Kay W. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 65 :51-62
[9]   Emergence of Carsharing Business Models and Sustainability Impacts in Swedish Cities [J].
Bocken, Nancy ;
Jonca, Alexandra ;
Sodergren, Karolina ;
Palm, Jenny .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
[10]   Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation [J].
Bocker, Lars ;
Meelen, Toon .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2017, 23 :28-39