Implementation of advance care planning in the routine care for acutely admitted patients in geriatric units: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

被引:6
作者
Romoren, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Hermansen, Karin Berg [3 ]
Saevareid, Trygve Johannes Lereim [1 ]
Broderud, Linn [1 ]
Westbye, Siri Faerden [1 ]
Wahl, Astrid Klopstad [4 ]
Thoresen, Lisbeth [4 ]
Rostoft, Siri [5 ,6 ]
Forde, Reidun [1 ]
Ahmed, Marc [5 ]
Aas, Eline [7 ,8 ]
Midtbust, May Helen [3 ]
Pedersen, Reidar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Ctr Med Ethics, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Dept Gen Practice, Oslo, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Sci Aalesund, Alesund, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Dept Interdisciplinary Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Geriatr Med, Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Dept Hlth Management & Hlth Econ, Oslo, Norway
[8] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Advance care planning; Acute admissions; Geriatric patients; Older adults; Complex intervention; Health service research; Clinical ethics; Implementation; END-OF-LIFE; NURSING-HOMES; HEALTH-CARE; COMMUNICATION; FACILITATORS; DEFINITION; BARRIERS; NORWAY;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-10666-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAcutely ill and frail older adults and their next of kin are often poorly involved in treatment and care decisions. This may lead to either over- or undertreatment and unnecessary burdens. The aim of this project is to improve user involvement and health services for frail older adults living at home, and their relatives, by implementing advance care planning (ACP) in selected hospital wards, and to evaluate the clinical and the implementation interventions.MethodsThis is a cluster randomized trial with 12 hospital units. The intervention arm receives implementation support for 18 months; control units receive the same support afterwards. The ACP intervention consists of 1. Clinical intervention: ACP; 2. Implementation interventions: Implementation team, ACP coordinator, network meetings, training and supervision for health care personnel, documentation tools and other resources, and fidelity measurements with tailored feedback; 3. Implementation strategies: leadership commitment, whole ward approach and responsive evaluation. Fidelity will be measured three times in the intervention arm and twice in the control arm. Here, the primary outcome is the difference in fidelity changes between the arms. We will also include 420 geriatric patients with one close relative and an attending clinician in a triadic sub-study. Here, the primary outcomes are quality of communication and decision-making when approaching the end of life as perceived by patients and next of kin, and congruence between the patient's preferences for information and involvement and the clinician's perceptions of the same. For patients we will also collect clinical data and health register data. Additionally, all clinical staff in both arms will be invited to answer a questionnaire before and during the implementation period. To explore barriers and facilitators and further explore the significance of ACP, qualitative interviews will be performed in the intervention units with patients, next of kin, health care personnel and implementation teams, and with other stakeholders up to national level. Lastly, we will evaluate resource utilization, costs and health outcomes in a cost-effectiveness analysis.DiscussionThe project may contribute to improved implementation of ACP as well as valuable knowledge and methodological developments in the scientific fields of ACP, health service research and implementation science.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05681585. Registered 03.01.23.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] The practice and politics of responsive evaluation
    Abma, TA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2006, 27 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1964, WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Etical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
  • [3] Communication About Serious Illness Care Goals A Review and Synthesis of Best Practices
    Bernacki, Rachelle E.
    Block, Susan D.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (12) : 1994 - 2003
  • [4] Care pathways at end-of-life for cancer decedents: registry based analyses of the living situation, healthcare utilization and costs for all cancer decedents in Norway in 2009-2013 during their last 6 months of life
    Bjornelv, Gudrun
    Hagen, Terje P.
    Forma, Leena
    Aas, Eline
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [5] Assessing the Fidelity of Evidence-Based Practices: History and Current Status of a Standardized Measurement Methodology
    Bond, Gary R.
    Drake, Robert E.
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 47 (06) : 874 - 884
  • [6] Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 9 (01) : 3 - 26
  • [7] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [8] The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: A systematic review
    Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, Arianne
    Rietjens, Judith A. C.
    van der Heide, Agnes
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (08) : 1000 - 1025
  • [9] The CarerQol instrument: A new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations
    Brouwer, W. B. F.
    van Exel, N. J. A.
    van Gorp, B.
    Redekop, W. K.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (06) : 1005 - 1021
  • [10] A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity
    Carroll, Christopher
    Patterson, Malcolm
    Wood, Stephen
    Booth, Andrew
    Rick, Jo
    Balain, Shashi
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2007, 2