ESG rating disagreement and stock returns: Evidence from China

被引:47
作者
Wang, Jianli [1 ]
Wang, Shaolin [1 ]
Dong, Minghua [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Hongxia [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ESG; Rating disagreement; Stock returns; Investor behaviour; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; INVESTOR SENTIMENT; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; LIMITED ATTENTION; CROSS-SECTION; EQUITY; COST; RISK; UNCERTAINTY; INATTENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103043
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings are receiving increasing attention in the financial market. However, ESG rating disagreement creates a barrier to ESG investment. This study explores empirically how ESG rating disagreement affects the Chinese capital market based on rating data from six agencies. The results show that ESG rating disagreement has a significant negative impact on stock returns. Mechanism analysis indicates that ESG rating disagreement can lead to decreased investor sentiment and, subsequently, a drop in stock returns. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that this negative impact is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, companies with higher average ESG ratings, and those with fewer institutional investors. Moreover, the governance dimension is the crucial factor driving the drop in stock returns. Therefore, investors and decision makers should consider comprehensive information from multiple agencies when assessing ESG ratings to help mitigate decision bias.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Ackert L.F., 1997, J FINANC RES, V20, P263
  • [2] The role of the external auditor in managing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reputation risk
    Asante-Appiah, Bright
    Lambert, Tamara A.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2023, 28 (04) : 2589 - 2641
  • [3] Institutional Investment Horizons and the Cost of Equity Capital
    Attig, Najah
    Cleary, Sean
    El Ghoul, Sadok
    Guedhami, Omrane
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 42 (02) : 441 - 477
  • [4] Do Socially Responsible Investment Policies Add or Destroy European Stock Portfolio Value?
    Auer, Benjamin R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 135 (02) : 381 - 397
  • [5] Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty
    Avramov, Doron
    Cheng, Si
    Lioui, Abraham
    Tarelli, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 145 (02) : 642 - 664
  • [6] Market liquidity as a sentiment indicator
    Baker, M
    Stein, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2004, 7 (03) : 271 - 299
  • [7] Investor sentiment in the stock market
    Baker, Malcolm
    Wurgler, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (02) : 129 - 151
  • [8] Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns
    Baker, Malcolm
    Wurgler, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (04) : 1645 - 1680
  • [9] Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility
    Barnett, Michael L.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) : 794 - 816
  • [10] Reducing the Carbon Intensity of Low Volatility Portfolios
    Bender, Jennifer
    He, Chen
    Ooi, Chee
    Sun, Xiaole
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 2020, 46 (03) : 108 - 122