Volumetric analysis of effectiveness of embolization for preventing type II endoleaks following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

被引:2
作者
Sun, Yuan [1 ]
Cai, Hong-Bo [1 ]
Yang, Di [2 ]
Li, Wei-Yi [1 ]
Zhao, Wei [3 ]
Hu, Ji-Hong [3 ]
Li, Min [1 ]
Peng, Ming-Sheng [1 ]
Yuan, Feng [3 ]
Qing, Kai-Xiong [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Vasc Surg, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[3] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[4] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Vasc Surg, 295 XiChang Rd, Kunming 650032, Yunnan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
AAA; Endoleak; EVAR; Fibrin sealant; Preemptive embolization; MESENTERIC-ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; SAC EMBOLIZATION; TRIAL; RISK; EVAR; OUTCOMES; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.033
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The presence of endoleak was associated with the failure of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) treatment. The key to eliminating type II endoleak has shifted from reintervention to prevention. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of applying fibrin sealant to prevent type II endoleak in conjunction with EVAR. Methods: All patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent EVAR from June 2019 to July 2021 were reviewed. Patients were grouped as Group A: standard EVAR with preemptive embolization and Group B: standard EVAR alone. The primary endpoint was the incidence of type II endoleak. The secondary endpoints were aneurysm sac regression, the inferior mesenteric artery patency, the numbers of patent lumbar arteries, and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 104 patients were included in Group A, and 116 were included in Group B. Technical success rate was 100%. The overall incidence of type II endoleak in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (4.8% vs 19.0%). The mean time of freedom from type II endoleak was 22.71 months for Group A (95% confidence interval, 21.59-23.83 months) and 19.89 months for Group B (95% confidence interval, 18.08-21.70 months). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from type II endoleak showed a significantly longer duration of freedom from type II endoleak in Group A (81.0% vs 95.2%). Group A showed a continuous sac regression tendency. In Group B, the sac volume decreased within 12 months but increased by 3.07 cm3 at 24 months. No complications were noted in both groups. Conclusions: Nonselective preemptive embolization with porcine fibrin sealant during EVAR was safe and effective in preventing type II endoleak in the short and mid-term. Preemptive embolization can lead to a significantly higher sac regression rate. Larger patient populations and longer follow-ups with randomized control designed trials are expected to verify the long-term effectiveness and safety of preemptive embolization in preventing type II endoleak. (J Vasc Surg 2023;77:752-9.)
引用
收藏
页码:752 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]   Outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair with contemporary volume-dependent sac embolization in patients at risk for type II endoleak [J].
Piazza, Michele ;
Squizzato, Francesco ;
Zavatta, Marco ;
Menegolo, Mirko ;
Ricotta, Joseph J., II ;
Lepidi, Sandro ;
Grego, Franco ;
Antonello, Michele .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 63 (01) :32-38
[22]   A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Prinssen, M ;
Verhoeven, ELG ;
Buth, J ;
Cuypers, PWM ;
van Sambeek, MRHM ;
Balm, R ;
Buskens, E ;
Grobbee, DE ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Grobbee, DE ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Buth, J ;
Pattynama, PM ;
Verhoeven, ELG ;
van Voorthuisen, AE ;
Bak, AAA ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Prinssen, M ;
van Sambeek, MRHM ;
Verhoeven, ELG ;
Buth, J ;
Cuypers, PWM ;
Balm, R ;
Buskens, E ;
Grobbee, DE ;
Hunink, MG ;
van Engelshoven, JM ;
Jacobs, MJHM ;
de Mol, BAJM ;
van Bockel, JH ;
Balm, R ;
Reekers, J ;
Tielbeek, X ;
Verhoeven, ELG ;
Wisselink, W ;
Boekema, N ;
Sikking, I ;
Prinssen, M ;
Balm, R ;
Buth, J ;
van Sambeek, MRHM ;
Verhoeven, ELG ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Prinssen, M ;
Buskens, E ;
Buth, J ;
Tielbeek, AV ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Balm, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (16) :1607-1618
[23]   Society for Vascular Surgery implementation of clinical practice guidelines for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Screening for an abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Rokosh, Rae S. ;
Mastracci, Tara M. ;
Chaikof, Elliot L. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 73 (04) :1126-1127
[24]   Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With Inferior Mesenteric Artery Embolization for Preventing Type II Endoleak A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Samura, Makoto ;
Morikage, Noriyasu ;
Otsuka, Ryo ;
Mizoguchi, Takahiro ;
Takeuchi, Yuriko ;
Nagase, Takashi ;
Harada, Takasuke ;
Yamashita, Osamu ;
Suehiro, Kotaro ;
Hamano, Kimikazu .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (02) :238-244
[25]   Long-term follow-up of type II endoleak embolization reveals the need for close surveillance [J].
Sarac, Timur P. ;
Gibbons, Connor ;
Vargas, Lina ;
Liu, Jane ;
Srivastava, Sunita ;
Bena, James ;
Mastracci, Tara ;
Kashyap, Vikram S. ;
Clair, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 55 (01) :33-40
[26]   Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair [J].
Sidloff, D. A. ;
Stather, P. W. ;
Choke, E. ;
Bown, M. J. ;
Sayers, R. D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (10) :1262-1270
[27]   Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up [J].
van Marrewijk, CJ ;
Fransen, G ;
Laheij, RJF ;
Harris, PL ;
Buth, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 27 (02) :128-137
[28]   Preoperative Inferior Mesenteric Artery Embolization before Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Decreased Incidence of Type II Endo leak and Aneurysm Sac Enlargement with 24-month Follow-up [J].
Ward, Thomas J. ;
Cohen, Stuart ;
Fischman, Aaron M. ;
Kim, Edward ;
Nowakowski, Francis S. ;
Ellozy, Sharif H. ;
Faries, Peter L. ;
Marin, Michael L. ;
Lookstein, Robert A. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (01) :49-55