Systemic risk in the Scandinavian banking sector

被引:4
作者
Hedstrom, Axel Per [1 ]
Uddin, Gazi Salah [1 ]
Rahman, Md Lutfur [2 ]
Sjo, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle Business Sch, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
关键词
banking sector; cross-quantilogram; systemic risk; tail dependence; DIRECTIONAL PREDICTABILITY; QUANTILE DEPENDENCE; NONINTEREST INCOME; OIL; CONNECTEDNESS; SPILLOVERS; VOLATILITY; INSURANCE; LIQUIDITY; DEFAULTS;
D O I
10.1002/ijfe.2699
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The banking sectors in the Scandinavian countries are highly concentrated, typically undercapitalised and they have suffered through several crises since the 1990s. This article analyses the systemic risk in Denmark, Norway and Sweden focusing on the co-dependence in the tails of equity returns of an individual bank and the overall banking system. We use, partly in a new way, conditional cross-quantilograms (CQs) for this purpose. We find that the CQs are positive and statistically significant in the low and high quantiles indicating that the Scandinavian banks are systemically linked. The low-quantile dependence is relatively stronger compared with the magnitude of dependence in the other quantiles. These results hold even after controlling for equity market volatility and economic policy uncertainty. We further observe that the systemic risk was insignificant from the early-2000 to the outbreak of the global financial crisis (GFC). However, after the GFC and the euro zone crisis, the systemic risk has increased substantially. Finally, we find that bank size has a positive relationship with systemic risk (low-quantile dependence) while return on asset and loan to deposit ratio exhibit a negative influence. Furthermore, these relationships are asymmetric across quantiles.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 608
页数:28
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Hedging emerging market stock prices with oil, gold, VIX, and bonds: A comparison between DCC, ADCC and GO-GARCH
    Abul Basher, Syed
    Sadorsky, Perry
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 : 235 - 247
  • [2] Capital Shortfall: A New Approach to Ranking and Regulating Systemic Risks
    Acharya, Viral
    Engle, Robert
    Richardson, Matthew
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (03) : 59 - 64
  • [3] Measuring Systemic Risk
    Acharya, Viral V.
    Pedersen, Lasse H.
    Philippon, Thomas
    Richardson, Matthew
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2017, 30 (01) : 2 - 47
  • [4] Acharya VV, 2011, WILEY FINANC SER, P319
  • [5] CoVaR
    Adrian, Tobias
    Brunnermeier, Markus K.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (07) : 1705 - 1741
  • [6] Systemic loops and liquidity regulation
    Aldasoro, Inaki
    Faia, Ester
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2016, 27 : 1 - 16
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2019, INVESTINGCOM
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2013, GLOBAL SYSTEMICALLY
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2012, Technical Report
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2019, DANMARKS NATIONALBAN