The risk-based breast screening (RIBBS) study protocol: a personalized screening model for young women

被引:2
|
作者
Gennaro, Gisella [1 ]
Bucchi, Lauro [2 ]
Ravaioli, Alessandra [2 ]
Zorzi, Manuel [3 ]
Falcini, Fabio [2 ,4 ]
Russo, Francesca [5 ]
Caumo, Francesca [1 ]
机构
[1] Veneto Inst Oncol IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy
[2] IRCCS Ist Romagnolo Studio Tumori IRST Dino Amador, Romagna Canc Inst, Emilia Romagna Canc Registry, Meldola, Forli, Italy
[3] Azienda Zero, SER Serv Epidemiol Reg & Registri, Padua, Italy
[4] Local Hlth Author, Canc Prevent Unit, Forli, Italy
[5] Direz Prevenz Sicurezza Alimentare Vet, Reg Veneto, Venice, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2024年 / 129卷 / 05期
关键词
Breast cancer; Cancer screening; Breast density; Risk assessment; Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; PRECISION MEDICINE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CANCER; PROGRAM; DENSITY; STAGE; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; INTERVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-024-01797-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The optimal mammography screening strategy for women aged 45-49 years is a matter of debate. We present the RIBBS study protocol, a quasi-experimental, prospective, population-based study comparing a risk- and breast density-stratified screening model (interventional cohort) with annual digital mammography (DM) screening (observational control cohort) in a real-world setting. The interventional cohort consists of 10,269 women aged 45 years enrolled between 2020 and 2021 from two provinces of the Veneto Region (northen Italy). At baseline, participants underwent two-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and completed the Tyrer-Cuzick risk prediction model. Volumetric breast density (VBD) was calculated from DBT and the lifetime risk (LTR) was estimated by including VBD among the risk factors. Based on VBD and LTR, women were classified into five subgroups with specific screening protocols for subsequent screening rounds: (1) LTR <= 17% and nondense breast: biennial DBT; (2) LTR <= 17% and dense breast: biennial DBT and ultrasound; (3) LTR 17-30% or LTR > 30% without family history of BC, and nondense breast: annual DBT; (4) LTR 17-30% or > 30% without family history of BC, and dense breast: annual DBT and ultrasound; and (5) LTR > 30% and family history of BC: annual DBT and breast MRI. The interventional cohort is still ongoing. An observational, nonequivalent control cohort of 43,000 women aged 45 years participating in an annual DM screening programme was recruited in three provinces of the neighbouring Emilia-Romagna Region. Cumulative incidence rates of advanced BC at three, five, and ten years between the two cohorts will be compared, adjusting for the incidence difference at baseline.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 736
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dutch women's intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers
    Rainey, Linda
    van der Waal, Danielle
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [32] Women's perspectives on the acceptability of risk-based cervical cancer screening
    Remmel, Maali-Liina
    Suija, Kadri
    Raudne, Riina
    Tisler, Anna
    Kivite-Urtane, Anda
    Stankunas, Mindaugas
    Nygard, Mari
    Aasbo, Gunvor
    Malina, Laura
    Uuskula, Anneli
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [33] Communicating the results of risk-based breast cancer screening through visualizations of risk: a participatory design approach
    van Strien-Knippenberg, Inge S.
    Arjangi-Babetti, Hannah
    Timmermans, Danielle R. M.
    Schrauwen, Laura
    Fransen, Mirjam P.
    Melles, Marijke
    Damman, Olga C.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] Assessing breast cancer risk within the general screening population: developing a breast cancer risk model to identify higher risk women at mammographic screening
    Mohamed Abdolell
    Jennifer I. Payne
    Judy Caines
    Kaitlyn Tsuruda
    Penny J. Barnes
    Pam J. Talbot
    Olivia Tong
    Peter Brown
    Michael Rivers-Bowerman
    Sian Iles
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 5417 - 5426
  • [35] Genetic discrimination in insurance and employment based on personalized risk stratification for breast cancer screening
    Reveiz, Manuela
    Bouhouita-Guermech, Sarah
    Blackmore, Kristina M.
    Chiquette, Jocelyne
    Demers, Eric
    Dorval, Michel
    Lambert-Cote, Laurence
    Nabi, Hermann
    Pashayan, Nora
    Soucy, Penny
    Turgeon, Annie
    Walker, Meghan J.
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    Chiarelli, Anna M.
    Simard, Jacques
    Joly, Yann
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2025, 16
  • [36] Communicating the results of risk-based breast cancer screening through visualizations of risk: a participatory design approach
    Inge S. van Strien-Knippenberg
    Hannah Arjangi-Babetti
    Danielle R. M. Timmermans
    Laura Schrauwen
    Mirjam P. Fransen
    Marijke Melles
    Olga C. Damman
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24
  • [37] Breast cancer risk stratification for mammographic screening: A nation-wide screening cohort of 24,431 women in Singapore
    Ho, Peh Joo
    Wong, Fuh Yong
    Chay, Wen Yee
    Lim, Elaine Hsuen
    Lim, Zi Lin
    Chia, Kee Seng
    Hartman, Mikael
    Li, Jingmei
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22): : 8182 - 8191
  • [38] Breast cancer risk feedback to women in the UK NHS breast screening population
    Evans, D. Gareth R.
    Donnelly, Louise S.
    Harkness, Elaine F.
    Astley, Susan M.
    Stavrinos, Paula
    Dawe, Sarah
    Watterson, Donna
    Fox, Lynne
    Sergeant, Jamie C.
    Ingham, Sarah
    Harvie, Michelle N.
    Wilson, Mary
    Beetles, Ursula
    Buchan, Iain
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    French, David P.
    Cuzick, Jack
    Howell, Anthony
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 114 (09) : 1045 - 1052
  • [39] Comparative effectiveness of breast MRI and mammography in screening young women with elevated risk of developing breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Narayan, Anand K.
    Visvanathan, Kala
    Harvey, Susan C.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 158 (03) : 583 - 589
  • [40] Breast Cancer Screening in an Era of Personalized Regimens A Conceptual Model and National Cancer Institute Initiative for Risk-Based and Preference-Based Approaches at a Population Level
    Onega, Tracy
    Beaber, Elisabeth F.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Barlow, William E.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Armstrong, Katrina
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    Geller, Berta
    Weaver, Donald L.
    Conant, Emily F.
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (19) : 2955 - 2964