Multimodal stance-taking in interaction-A systematic literature review

被引:13
作者
Andries, Fien [1 ]
Meissl, Katharina [2 ]
de Vries, Clarissa [2 ]
Feyaerts, Kurt [2 ]
Oben, Bert [2 ]
Sambre, Paul [1 ]
Vermeerbergen, Myriam [1 ,3 ]
Brone, Geert [2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Arts, Dept Linguist, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Arts, Dept Linguist, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Stellenbosch Univ, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Dept Afrikaans & Dutch, Stellenbosch, South Africa
关键词
systematic literature review; stance; stance-taking; multimodality; interaction; FACIAL EXPRESSION; SPEECH; GAZE; PARTICIPATION; EMBODIMENT; EMOTION; CHILDRENS; DISPLAYS; GESTURE; WORK;
D O I
10.3389/fcomm.2023.1187977
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Stance-taking, the public act of positioning oneself toward objects, people or states of affairs, has been studied in many fields of research. Recently, its multimodal realization in interaction has received increasing attention. The current contribution aims to take stock of research on multimodal stance-taking so far, and to present possible avenues for future research. We systematically gathered and appraised 76 articles that investigate the involvement of bodily-visual resources in stance-taking in interaction. The critical appraisal focused on two dimensions of the stance act: form-function relations constituting it, and its dynamic organization in interaction. Regarding form-function relations, we found systematic involvement of specific bodily-visual resources in different stance acts, as well as patterns of multimodal intensification and mitigation of stances. As for its dynamic organization, the review discusses how stance-taking is organized temporally throughout an interaction, with all participants involved carefully negotiating and adapting their stances to one another. Finally, attention is paid to the broader context of stance-taking, including its role in different social and societal contexts. Based on this review, we were able to identify several gaps in the literature, and avenues for future research. We argue that much potential for broadening the scope of research lies in increasing the methodological diversity in approaching multimodal stance-taking, as well as in cross-linguistic studies and varying settings and participant constellations. In conclusion, research into multimodal stance-taking is vibrant, with ample opportunities for future work. This review can be considered as a call to action to move beyond the premise that stance-taking is multimodal, and further investigate this intriguing and fundamental human capacity.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [71] Muller C., 2013, Body-Language-Communication. Volume 1: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction
  • [72] "I Can See Some Sadness in Your Eyes": When Experiential Therapists Notice a Client's Affectual Display
    Muntigl, Peter
    Horvath, Adam O.
    [J]. RESEARCH ON LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION, 2014, 47 (02) : 89 - 108
  • [73] Working to keep aligned in psychotherapy Using nods as a dialogic resource to display affiliation
    Muntigl, Peter
    Knight, Naomi
    Watkins, Ashley
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND DIALOGUE, 2012, 2 (01) : 9 - 27
  • [74] The reporting space in conversational storytelling: Orchestrating all semiotic channels for taking a stance
    Niemela, Maarit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2010, 42 (12) : 3258 - 3270
  • [75] The power of engagement Stance-taking, dialogic resonance and the construction of intersubjectivity
    Nir, Bracha
    Zima, Elisabeth
    [J]. FUNCTIONS OF LANGUAGE, 2017, 24 (01) : 3 - 15
  • [76] Young students' treatment of synthetic voicing as an interactional resource in digital writing
    Noren, Niklas
    Bowden, Helen Melander
    Evaldsson, Ann-Carita
    [J]. CLASSROOM DISCOURSE, 2022, 13 (03) : 241 - 263
  • [77] Clicks and percussives in English conversation
    Ogden, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL PHONETIC ASSOCIATION, 2013, 43 (03) : 299 - 320
  • [78] Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews
    Ouzzani M.
    Hammady H.
    Fedorowicz Z.
    Elmagarmid A.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [79] PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
    Page, Matthew J.
    Moher, David
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Hoffmann, Tammy C.
    Mulrow, Cynthia D.
    Shamseer, Larissa
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer M.
    Akl, Elie A.
    Brennan, Sue E.
    Chou, Roger
    Glanville, Julie
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn
    Lalu, Manoj M.
    Li, Tianjing
    Loder, Elizabeth W.
    Mayo-Wilson, Evan
    McDonald, Steve
    McGuinness, Luke A.
    Stewart, Lesley A.
    Thomas, James
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Welch, Vivian A.
    Whiting, Penny
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
  • [80] Endearment and address terms in family life: Children's and parents' requests in Italian and Swedish dinnertime interaction
    Pauletto, Franco
    Aronsson, Karin
    Galeano, Giorgia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2017, 109 : 82 - 94