Multimodal stance-taking in interaction-A systematic literature review

被引:13
作者
Andries, Fien [1 ]
Meissl, Katharina [2 ]
de Vries, Clarissa [2 ]
Feyaerts, Kurt [2 ]
Oben, Bert [2 ]
Sambre, Paul [1 ]
Vermeerbergen, Myriam [1 ,3 ]
Brone, Geert [2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Arts, Dept Linguist, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Arts, Dept Linguist, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Stellenbosch Univ, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Dept Afrikaans & Dutch, Stellenbosch, South Africa
关键词
systematic literature review; stance; stance-taking; multimodality; interaction; FACIAL EXPRESSION; SPEECH; GAZE; PARTICIPATION; EMBODIMENT; EMOTION; CHILDRENS; DISPLAYS; GESTURE; WORK;
D O I
10.3389/fcomm.2023.1187977
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Stance-taking, the public act of positioning oneself toward objects, people or states of affairs, has been studied in many fields of research. Recently, its multimodal realization in interaction has received increasing attention. The current contribution aims to take stock of research on multimodal stance-taking so far, and to present possible avenues for future research. We systematically gathered and appraised 76 articles that investigate the involvement of bodily-visual resources in stance-taking in interaction. The critical appraisal focused on two dimensions of the stance act: form-function relations constituting it, and its dynamic organization in interaction. Regarding form-function relations, we found systematic involvement of specific bodily-visual resources in different stance acts, as well as patterns of multimodal intensification and mitigation of stances. As for its dynamic organization, the review discusses how stance-taking is organized temporally throughout an interaction, with all participants involved carefully negotiating and adapting their stances to one another. Finally, attention is paid to the broader context of stance-taking, including its role in different social and societal contexts. Based on this review, we were able to identify several gaps in the literature, and avenues for future research. We argue that much potential for broadening the scope of research lies in increasing the methodological diversity in approaching multimodal stance-taking, as well as in cross-linguistic studies and varying settings and participant constellations. In conclusion, research into multimodal stance-taking is vibrant, with ample opportunities for future work. This review can be considered as a call to action to move beyond the premise that stance-taking is multimodal, and further investigate this intriguing and fundamental human capacity.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [101] Takanashi H., 2018, Handbook of Pragmatics, P173
  • [102] Disagreement practices in ELF academic group discussion: verbal, nonverbal and interactional strategies
    Toomaneejinda, Anuchit
    Harding, Luke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH AS A LINGUA FRANCA, 2018, 7 (02) : 307 - 332
  • [103] The Kinematics of Social Action: Visual Signals Provide Cues for What Interlocutors Do in Conversation
    Trujillo, James P.
    Holler, Judith
    [J]. BRAIN SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (08)
  • [104] A deontic perspective on the collaborative, multimodal accomplishment of leadership
    Van de Mieroop, Dorien
    [J]. LEADERSHIP, 2020, 16 (05) : 592 - 619
  • [105] Interpreters as laminated speakers: Gaze and gesture as interpersonal deixis in consecutive dialogue interpreting
    Vranjes, Jelena
    Brone, Geert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2021, 181 : 83 - 99
  • [106] Dual feedback in interpreter-mediated interactions: On the role of gaze in the production of listener responses
    Vranjes, Jelena
    Brone, Geert
    Feyaerts, Kurt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2018, 134 : 15 - 30
  • [107] Lexical Input in the Grammatical Expression of Stance: A Collexeme Analysis of the INTRODUCTORY IT PATTERN
    Wang, Zhong
    Fan, Weiwei
    Fang, Alex Chengyu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 12