The limited role of sustainability in mutual fund investor decisions: A machine learning approach

被引:2
作者
Vilas, Pablo [1 ]
Andreu, Laura [1 ]
Serrano-Cinca, Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Inst Employment Digital Soc & Sustainabil IEDIS, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Accounting & Finance, Gran Via 2, Zaragoza 50005, Spain
关键词
Investment decisions; Mutual funds; Social performance; Environmental social and governance; Neural networks; Decision trees; PROSPECT-THEORY; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; PRICE; INVESTMENTS; STOCKS; SMART; MONEY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123288
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Despite the growth in the supply of socially responsible investment products, the weight of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in the decisions of mutual fund investors remains under-researched. We conducted a study relating fund flows to past returns, ESG performance and other financial variables using data from 3,767 US mutual funds from 2015 to 2021. First, we aimed to assess the importance of ESG performance in investment decisions. Next, we studied whether ESG performance is increasingly important or has reached its limit. Finally, we developed decisional models to predict the flows raised by each investment fund, its financial return and ESG performance. We used logistic regression, neural networks, random forest and gradient boosting decision trees. We found that the investors consider ESG performance, but the factors that matter most are past growth, mutual fund fees and past returns. Our models predicted the money raised by the funds, obtaining accuracy rates of around 70%. In addition to confirming that "past financial return does not guarantee future financial return," we found that "past ESG performance guarantees future ESG performance," which may be of interest to socially responsible investors.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence [J].
Albuquerque, Rui ;
Koskinen, Yrjo ;
Zhang, Chendi .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (10) :4451-4469
[2]   The impact of the Morningstar Sustainability Rating on mutual fund flows [J].
Ammann, Manuel ;
Bauer, Christopher ;
Fischer, Sebastian ;
Mueller, Philipp .
EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 25 (03) :520-553
[3]   On the increasing importance of multiple criteria decision aid methods for portfolio selection [J].
Aouni, Belaid ;
Doumpos, Michalis ;
Perez-Gladish, Blanca ;
Steuer, Ralph E. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2018, 69 (10) :1525-1542
[4]   Going for Gold: An Analysis of Morningstar Analyst Ratings [J].
Armstrong, Will J. ;
Genc, Egemen ;
Verbeek, Marno .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (05) :2310-2327
[5]   Socially responsible investing worldwide: Do markets value corporate social responsibility? [J].
Badia, Guillermo ;
Cortez, Maria C. ;
Ferruz, Luis .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (06) :2751-2764
[6]  
Barber Brad, 2013, Handbook of the Economics of Finance, V2, P1533, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-44-459406-8.00022-6
[7]   Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment [J].
Barberis, Nicholas C. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 27 (01) :173-195
[8]   INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE OF COMMON-STOCKS IN RELATION TO THEIR PRICE-EARNINGS RATIOS - TEST OF EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS [J].
BASU, S .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1977, 32 (03) :663-682
[9]   Get Real! Individuals Prefer More Sustainable Investments [J].
Bauer, Rob ;
Ruof, Tobias ;
Smeets, Paul .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2021, 34 (08) :3976-4043
[10]   Debiasing investors with decision support systems: An experimental investigation [J].
Bhandari, Gokul ;
Hassanein, Khaled ;
Deaves, Richard .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2008, 46 (01) :399-410