Auditing and Rating Sustainability of Mediterranean Buildings, Neighbourhoods and Cities

被引:0
|
作者
Balaras, Constantinos A. [1 ]
Droutsa, Kalliopi G. [1 ]
Dascalaki, Elena G. [1 ]
Kontoyiannidis, Simon [1 ]
Moro, Andrea [2 ]
Bazzan, Elena [2 ]
Borgaro, Paola [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Observ Athens NOA, Inst Environm Res & Sustainable Dev IERSD, Grp Energy Conservat, Athens 15236, Greece
[2] Int Initiat Sustainable Built Environm, iiSBE Italia R&D, I-10138 Turin, Italy
关键词
sustainability; method; tool; buildings; neighbourhoods; cities; indicators; key performance indicators; KPI; cesba med;
D O I
10.3390/en17010082
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Sustainability rating systems for the built environment involve a multitude of indicators that are based on different types of data. This work capitalizes on an existing multicriteria assessment method and supporting decision-making tool at building and neighbourhood scale, to develop an enhanced method and tool at city scale. The main sustainability issues at building and city scales include site and infrastructure, energy and resources consumption, environmental loadings, climate change, environmental quality, water, waste, transportation, services, social aspects, economy and governance. Approximately 300 indicators distributed among the different scales are used to describe and quantify the various facets of sustainability. Specifically, the building scale includes a pool of 80 indicators of which 17 are key performance indicators (KPIs), the neighbourhood scale has 133 indicators of which 14 are KPIs and the city scale has a total of 99 indicators of which 10 are KPIs that were new additions to the existing method. The emphasis in this paper is given on elaborating the key performance indicators for cities and demonstrating their applicability through a case study. The common method and tools provide a flexible assessment system for local authorities and stakeholders to develop and assess sustainability plans.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainability rating systems for buildings: Comparisons and correlations
    Chandratilake, S. R.
    Dias, W. P. S.
    ENERGY, 2013, 59 : 22 - 28
  • [2] DEVELOPMENT OF A METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE SUSTAINABILITY IN NEIGHBOURHOODS OF INTERMEDIATE CITIES IN CHILE
    Zumelzu, Antonio
    Espinoza, Daniel
    REVISTA 180, 2019, (44): : 80 - 94
  • [3] Sustainability Rating Systems for Historic Buildings: A Systematic Review
    Karimi, Farzaneh
    Valibeig, Nima
    Memarian, Gholamhossein
    Kamari, Aliakbar
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [4] Can sustainability auditing be indigenized?
    Reid, John
    Rout, Matthew
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2018, 35 (02) : 283 - 294
  • [5] Sustainability index for industrial buildings
    Cuadrado, Jesus
    Roji, Eduardo
    Tomas San Jose, Jose
    Pedro Reyes, Juan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 165 (05) : 245 - 253
  • [6] RATING SYSTEMS AS A TOOL FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SUSTAINABILITY STANDARDS IN HIGH RISE BUILDINGS
    Begec, Hasan
    Hamidabad, Darioush Bashiri
    12th International Conference - Standardization, Prototypes and Quality: A Means of Balkan Countries' Collaboration, 2015, : 139 - 148
  • [7] Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBToolPT-H
    Mateus, Ricardo
    Braganca, Luis
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 46 (10) : 1962 - 1971
  • [8] Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model
    Newman, PWG
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1999, 44 (04) : 219 - 226
  • [9] Cities Auditing Model
    Matos, Florinda
    INTERNET OF THINGS: IOT INFRASTRUCTURES, PT II, 2015, 151 : 43 - 51
  • [10] Application of generalized Choquet fuzzy integral method in the sustainability rating of green buildings based on the BSAM scheme
    Olawumi, Timothy O.
    Chan, Daniel W. M.
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (61)