Assessing the Significance of Lymphadenectomy in Older Patients with Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

Advantages of lymphadenectomy for early stage endometrial cancer remain controversial. Lymphadenectomy had been routinely omitted for patients aged >= 70 years at our institute if lymph node metastasis was unsuspected due to an increased risk of peri- and postsurgical complications. Since 2013, with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery and considering the heterogeneous medical conditions, we started performing lymphadenectomy in patients who were considered well-tolerated. We retrospectively investigated our clinical database to assess the effect of lymphadenectomy in older patients with early stage endometrial carcinoma. Patients aged >= 70 years, preoperatively diagnosed with stage I endometrial carcinoma, and who underwent lymphadenectomy between 2013 and 2021 at Tohoku University Hospital were included in the lymphadenectomy group (n = 33), whereas patients who underwent surgery without lymphadenectomy before the end of 2012 were included in the no-lymphadenectomy group (n = 49). Clinical parameters and patient outcomes, such as disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), were compared. The median age was significantly higher and fewer patients received adjuvant chemotherapy in the no-lymphadenectomy group. Neither DSS nor DFS differed significantly between the two groups. Five-year-DFS rates were 77.2% and 82.5% and 5-year-DSS rates were 89.7% and 97.8% for the lymphadenectomy and no-lymphadenectomy groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the subsequent survival analysis by substage, histological subtype, or risk of recurrence. Our results suggest that the indications for lymphadenectomy in older patients should be individually optimized according to the risk of recurrence and postoperative complications.