What Do Beginning Students Think about Philosophy before Their First College Course?

被引:0
作者
Peterson, Bailie [1 ]
Agboola, David [1 ]
Lundberg, Kelly [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639 USA
关键词
pedagogy; teaching; feminist philosophy; first-generation students; student perceptions; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1017/apa.2023.12
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In this article, we present the results of an original study identifying the perceptions of beginning philosophy students at the start of their first introductory course. We surveyed over 1,100 students representing over 40 universities and colleges in the United States regarding their initial perceptions of gender bias, inclusivity, value, understanding, similarities, and enjoyment of philosophy. We analyzed the results based on gender, first-generation status, and student of color status. This work represents the perspectives of a more diverse range of students, reflecting far more first-generation college students (40 percent) and students who identify as people of color (43 percent) than in previous work. Additionally, this study provides novel data as we were able to collect data on the first day of classes, in most cases before students were exposed to syllabi or content that could inform their views about philosophy. Understanding what beginning students think about philosophy before formal exposure to the field might help us to identify concerns, misconceptions, and areas for improvement. Many results are striking, and our project offers insight into the initial perspectives of philosophy students.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 587
页数:11
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
American Philosophical Association, 2021, RES DIV INCL
[2]   Similarity and enjoyment: Predicting continuation for women in philosophy [J].
Demarest, Heather ;
Robertson, Seth ;
Haggard, Megan ;
Martin-Seaver, Madeline ;
Bickel, Jewelle .
ANALYSIS, 2017, 77 (03) :525-541
[3]  
Falbo Arianna., 2021, APA NEWSLETTER FEMIN, V20, P38
[4]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191
[5]   Gender Equity in College Majors: Looking Beyond the STEM/Non-STEM Dichotomy for Answers Regarding Female Participation [J].
Ganley, Colleen M. ;
George, Casey E. ;
Cimpian, Joseph R. ;
Makowski, Martha B. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 55 (03) :453-487
[6]  
Hulin C, 2001, J CONSUM PSYCHOL, V10, P55, DOI 10.1207/S15327663JCP1001&2_05
[7]  
Jolley A., 2012, Journal of Geoscience Education, V60, P83
[8]  
Morton J.M., 2019, Moving up without losing your way: The ethical costs of upward mobility
[9]   Quantifying the Gender Gap: An Empirical Study of the Underrepresentation of Women in Philosophy [J].
Paxton, Molly ;
Figdor, Carrie ;
Tiberius, Valerie .
HYPATIA-A JOURNAL OF FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY, 2012, 27 (04) :949-957
[10]  
Saul J., 2013, WOMEN PHILOS WHAT NE, P39, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199325603.003.0003