Assessing the imperative of conditioning factor grading in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility modeling: A critical inquiry

被引:46
作者
Zeng, Taorui [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Bijing [3 ]
Glade, Thomas [2 ]
Xie, Yangyi [3 ]
Li, Ying [4 ]
Zhu, Yuhang [3 ]
Yin, Kunlong [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Inst Geol Survey, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Vienna, Dept Geog & Reg Res, ENGAGE Geomorph Syst & Risk Res, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[3] China Univ Geosci, Fac Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Northeastern Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Landslide susceptibility modeling; Machine learning model; Factor grading; Standardization guidance; Three Gorges Reservoir area; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DECISION TREE; PREDICTION; AREA; CLASSIFICATION; COLLINEARITY; UNCERTAINTY; ENSEMBLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.catena.2023.107732
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Current machine learning approaches to landslide susceptibility modeling often involve grading conditioning factors, a method characterized by substantial subjectivity and randomness. The necessity and rationality of such grading have sparked continued debate. Recognizing the potential profound impact of this grading on the results of models, we conducted an in-depth study focusing on four townships within the Wanzhou section of the Three Gorges Reservoir area. A comprehensive assessment was conducted using three traditional machine learning models, five ensemble learning models, and four deep learning models to evaluate the implications of continuous factor grading. Three grading strategies were explored: non-grading, equal intervals, and natural breaks. Further investigation was conducted to determine how various grade levels (e.g., 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20) affect model effi-cacy. Our analysis reveals that the Support Vector Machine (SVM) model performs optimally with an 8-level grading using natural breaks. In contrast, a decision tree (DT) and its associated ensemble models are more effective without grading. For Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) models, a natural breaks grading exceeding 8 levels is advisable. Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) models benefit from an equidistant grading strategy of over 12 levels, while Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks (LSTM) models thrive with an equidistant grading surpassing 16 levels. This study is pioneering in introducing grading guidelines for machine learning models in landslide susceptibility modeling. Our findings offer invaluable insights for future research, setting a path towards more standardized practices in this field. This enhances the bridge between theoretical knowledge and its real-world application, promoting a more rigorous and systematic grading approach and advancing the standardization of landslide susceptibility modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Comparing classical statistic and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey [J].
Akinci, Halil ;
Zeybek, Mustafa .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 108 (02) :1515-1543
[2]   Spatial landslide susceptibility assessment using machine learning techniques assisted by additional data created with generative adversarial networks [J].
Al-Najjar, Husam A. H. ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet .
GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2021, 12 (02) :625-637
[3]   GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling: A comparison between fuzzy multi-criteria and machine learning algorithms [J].
Ali, Sk Ajim ;
Parvin, Farhana ;
Vojtekova, Jana ;
Costache, Romulus ;
Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh ;
Quoc Bao Pham ;
Vojtek, Matej ;
Gigovic, Ljubomir ;
Ahmad, Ateeque ;
Ghorbani, Mohammad Ali .
GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2021, 12 (02) :857-876
[4]   Landslide susceptibility modeling using Reduced Error Pruning Trees and different ensemble techniques: Hybrid machine learning approaches [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Singh, Sushant K. ;
Shirzadi, Ataollah ;
Shahabi, Himan ;
Thi-Thu-Trang Tran ;
Dieu Tien Buig .
CATENA, 2019, 175 :203-218
[5]   Spatial prediction of landslides using a hybrid machine learning approach based on Random Subspace and Classification and Regression Trees [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Dieu Tien Bui .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2018, 303 :256-270
[6]   Hybrid integration of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using GIS [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Dieu Tien Bui ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Dholakia, M. B. .
CATENA, 2017, 149 :52-63
[7]  
Boser B. E., 1992, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, P144, DOI 10.1145/130385.130401
[8]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[9]   Uncertainty analysis of non-landslide sample selection in landslide susceptibility prediction using slope unit-based machine learning models [J].
Chang, Zhilu ;
Huang, Jinsong ;
Huang, Faming ;
Bhuyan, Kushanav ;
Meena, Sansar Raj ;
Catani, Filippo .
GONDWANA RESEARCH, 2023, 117 :307-320
[10]   Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine - Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations [J].
Chen, Jonathan H. ;
Asch, Steven M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (26) :2507-2509