Assessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence software

被引:5
|
作者
Menezes, Liciane dos Santos [1 ]
Silva, Thaisa Pinheiro [2 ]
Lima dos Santos, Marcos Antonio [3 ]
Hughes, Mariana Mendonca [4 ]
Mariano Souza, Saulo dos Reis [4 ]
Leite Ribeiro, Patricia Miranda [1 ]
Luiz de Freitas, Paulo Henrique [4 ]
Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Bahia, Dept Oral Diag, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Oral Diag, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Oral Diag, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Sergipe, Dept Dent, Sergipe, Brazil
[5] Sao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Sch Dent, Diag & Surg, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Cephalometry; Reproducibility of results; Machine learning; Dental radiography; Radiology; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ACCURACY; SPEED;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr.20230065
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of an artificial intelligence (AI) software in identifying cephalometric points on lateral cephalometric radiographs considering four settings of brightness and contrast. Methods and materials Brightness and contrast of 30 lateral cephalometric radiographs were adjusted into four different settings. Then, the control examiner (ECont), the calibrated examiner (ECal), and the CEFBOT AI software (AIs) each marked 19 cephalometric points on all radiographs. Reliability was assessed with a second analysis of the radiographs 15 days after the first one. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Reliability of landmark identification was excellent for the human examiners and the AIs regardless of the type of brightness and contrast setting (mean intraclass correlation coefficient >0.89). When ECont and ECal were compared for reproducibility, there were more cephalometric points with significant differences on the x-axis of the image with the highest contrast and the lowest brightness, namely N(p = 0.033), S(p = 0.030), Po(p < 0.001), and Pog'(p = 0.012). Between ECont and AIs, there were more cephalometric points with significant differences on the image with the highest contrast and the lowest brightness, namely N(p = 0.034), Or(p = 0.048), Po(p < 0.001), A(p = 0.042), Pog'(p = 0.004), Ll(p = 0.005), Ul(p < 0.001), and Sn(p = 0.001). Conclusions While the reliability of the AIs for cephalometric landmark identification was rated as excellent, low brightness and high contrast seemed to affect its reproducibility. The experienced human examiner, on the other hand, did not show such faulty reproducibility; therefore, the AIs used in this study is an excellent auxiliary tool for cephalometric analysis, but still depends on human supervision to be clinically reliable.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Assessment of automatic cephalometric landmark identification using artificial intelligence
    Bulatova, Galina
    Kusnoto, Budi
    Grace, Viana
    Tsay, T. Peter
    Avenetti, David M.
    Sanchez, Flavio Jose Castelli
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2021, 24 : 37 - 42
  • [2] Cervical vertebral maturation assessment on lateral cephalometric radiographs using artificial intelligence: comparison of machine learning classifier models
    Amasya, Hakan
    Yildirim, Derya
    Aydogan, Turgay
    Kemaloglu, Nazan
    Orhan, Kaan
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (05)
  • [3] Cephalometric analysis performance discrepancy between orthodontists and an artificial intelligence model using lateral cephalometric radiographs
    Guinot-Barona, Clara
    Perez-Barquero, Jorge Alonso
    Lopez, Lidia Galan
    Barmak, Abdul B.
    Att, Wael
    Kois, John C.
    Revilla-Leon, Marta
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 36 (04) : 555 - 565
  • [4] Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification?
    Huayu Ye
    Zixuan Cheng
    Nicha Ungvijanpunya
    Wenjing Chen
    Li Cao
    Yongchao Gou
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [5] Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification?
    Ye, Huayu
    Cheng, Zixuan
    Ungvijanpunya, Nicha
    Chen, Wenjing
    Cao, Li
    Gou, Yongchao
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [6] A Review on Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Identification Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques
    Neeraja, R.
    Anbarasi, L. Jani
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON I-SMAC (IOT IN SOCIAL, MOBILE, ANALYTICS AND CLOUD) (I-SMAC 2021), 2021, : 572 - 577
  • [7] Assessment of the quality of different commercial providers using artificial intelligence for automated cephalometric analysis compared to human orthodontic experts
    Kunz, Felix
    Stellzig-Eisenhauer, Angelika
    Widmaier, Lisa Marie
    Zeman, Florian
    Boldt, Julian
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2023, 86 (3): : 145 - 160
  • [8] Estimating mandibular growth stage based on cervical vertebral maturation in lateral cephalometric radiographs using artificial intelligence
    Shoari, Sajjad Alipour
    Sadrolashrafi, Seyed Vahid
    Sohrabi, Aydin
    Afrouzian, Reza
    Ebrahimi, Pooya
    Kouhsoltani, Maryam
    Soltani, Minou Kouh
    PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [9] Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Detection
    Ugurlu, Mehmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [10] Automatic detection of mesiodens on panoramic radiographs using artificial intelligence
    Ha, Eun-Gyu
    Jeon, Kug Jin
    Kim, Young Hyun
    Kim, Jae-Young
    Han, Sang-Sun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)