Constructing the public in public perceptions research: A case study of forest genomics

被引:0
作者
Berseth, Valerie [1 ,4 ]
Taylor, Jennifer [2 ]
Hutchen, Jenna [1 ]
Nguyen, Vivian [1 ]
Schott, Stephan [1 ]
Klenk, Nicole [3 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Carleton Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
关键词
attitudes on genetics; co-production of knowledge; deficit model; imagined publics; risk; science attitudes and perceptions; scientific controversies; technology assessment; DEFICIT MODEL; SOCIOTECHNICAL CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SCIENCE; COPRODUCTION; KNOWLEDGE; PARTICIPATION; TECHNOLOGY; SCIENTISTS; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1177/09636625231210453
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Contemporary scientific and technological endeavours face public and political pressure to adopt open, transparent and democratically accountable practices of public engagement. Prior research has identified different ways that experts 'imagine publics' - as uninformed, as disengaged, as a risk to science, and as co-producers of knowledge - but there has yet to be a systematic exploration of how these views emerge, interact and evolve. This article introduces a typology of imagined publics to analyse how publics are constructed in the field of forest genomics. We find that deficit views of publics have not been replaced by co-production. Instead, deficit and co-productive approaches to publics co-exist and overlap, informing both how publics are characterized and how public perceptions are studied. We outline an agenda for deepening and expanding research on public perceptions of novel technologies. Specifically, we call for more diverse and complex methodological approaches that account for relational dynamics over time.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 503
页数:21
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Anderson K., 2019, RES RECONCILIATION U, P241
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Science as Culture, DOI [10.1080/09505430802280727, DOI 10.1080/09505430802280727]
  • [3] Attride-Stirling J., 2001, QUALITATIVE RES, V1, P385, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307, DOI 10.1177/146879410100100307, 10.1177/146879410100100307]
  • [4] Why we disagree about assisted migration: Ethical implications of a key debate regarding the future of Canada's forests
    Aubin, I.
    Garbe, C. M.
    Colombo, S.
    Drever, C. R.
    McKenney, D. W.
    Messier, C.
    Pedlar, J.
    Saner, M. A.
    Venier, L.
    Wellstead, A. M.
    Winder, R.
    Witten, E.
    Ste-Marie, C.
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2011, 87 (06) : 755 - 765
  • [5] How scientists view the public, the media and the political process
    Besley, John C.
    Nisbet, Matthew
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2013, 22 (06) : 644 - 659
  • [6] Co-producing uncertainty in public science: The case of genomic selection in forestry
    Blue, Gwendolyn
    Davidson, Debra
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2021, 30 (04) : 455 - 469
  • [7] The disengaged in science communication: How not to count audiences and publics
    Burns, Maureen
    Medvecky, Fabien
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2018, 27 (02) : 118 - 130
  • [8] Knowledge coevolution: generating new understanding through bridging and strengthening distinct knowledge systems and empowering local knowledge holders
    Chapman, J. M.
    Schott, S.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (03) : 931 - 943
  • [9] Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change: The case of energy system transitions
    Chilvers, Jason
    Pallett, Helen
    Hargreaves, Tom
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 42 : 199 - 210
  • [10] Knowledge co-production: A pathway to effective fisheries management, conservation, and governance
    Cooke, Steven J.
    Nguyen, Vivian M.
    Chapman, Jacqueline M.
    Reid, Andrea J.
    Landsman, Sean J.
    Young, Nathan
    Hinch, Scott G.
    Schott, Stephan
    Mandrak, Nicholas E.
    Semeniuk, Christina A. D.
    [J]. FISHERIES, 2021, 46 (02) : 89 - 97