Perinatal and maternal outcomes according to timing of induction of labour: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
Jeer, Bavita [1 ]
Haberfeld, Emily [1 ]
Khalil, Asma [2 ,3 ]
Thangaratinam, Shakila [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Allotey, John [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, England
[2] St Georges Univ London, St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Fetal Med Unit, London, England
[3] St Georges Univ London, Amol & Clin Sci Res Inst, London, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Metab & Syst Res, WHO Collaborating Ctr Global Womens Hlth, ITM Heritage Bldg, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, England
[5] Birmingham Womens & Childrens NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Birmingham Biomed Res Ctr, Birmingham, England
关键词
Induction; Labour; Meta-analysis; Caesarean section; Stillbirth; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; PROLONGED PREGNANCY; POSTTERM PREGNANCY; ELECTIVE INDUCTION; TERM PREGNANCY; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; RISK; MEMBRANES; GESTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.07.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The risk of adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes increases with gestational age, and although induction of labour may reduce these risks, the optimal timing of induction remains unknown. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis, to determine the gestational age at which induction should be offered. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Embase databases from inception to July 2022, to identify randomised trials comparing induction of labour at or beyond 37 & PRIME; weeks gestation with expectant management or delayed induction, and according to the gestational age at planned induction. We undertook random effects meta-analysis and pooled estimates as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed risk of bias of studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. We included 44 trials (23,960 women and 22,191 offspring) from 1,839 citations in our meta-analysis. The odds of perinatal death (odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.81; 26 studies, 20,154 offspring), stillbirth (0.40, 0.16 to 0.98; 25 studies, 19,412 offspring), admission to neonatal intensive care unit (0.86, 0.78 to 0.96; 23 studies, 18,846 offspring), and caesarean section (0.90, 0.83 to 0.98; 40 studies, 23,616 women) were reduced in the induction of labour group compared to expectant management or delayed induction. The odds of admission to neonatal intensive care unit (0.82, 0.70 to 0.96; 6 studies, 9,316 offspring) were lower with induction of labour at 41 weeks compared to induction at or after 42 weeks' gestation, and the odds of caesarean section were reduced with labour induction at 39 weeks' compared to induction at or after 40 weeks' (0.83, 0.74 to 0.93; 8 studies, 7,677 women). There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes by method of induction of labour. Induction of labour compared to expectant management or delayed induction reduces the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the optimal timing may depend on the specific outcome of interest.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 182
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and perinatal safety and clinical outcomes
    Turner, Jessica M.
    Russo, Francesca
    Deprest, Jan
    Mol, Ben W.
    Kumar, Sailesh
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 (11) : 1817 - 1831
  • [42] The impact of timing on outcomes in appendicectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Calpin, Gavin G.
    Hembrecht, Sandra
    Giblin, Katie
    Hehir, Cian
    Dowling, Gavin P.
    Hill, Arnold D. K.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [43] Outcomes of Outpatient Versus Inpatient Induction of Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mustafa, Mohammed
    Babiker, Mohamed
    Abusin, Fatema
    Mohammed, Tamador
    Awadalla, Tarig
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [44] The association between the regular use of preventive labour induction and improved term birth outcomes: findings of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nicholson, J. M.
    Kellar, L. C.
    Henning, G. F.
    Waheed, A.
    Colon-Gonzalez, M.
    Ural, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (06) : 773 - 784
  • [45] The effect of maternal gestational diabetes on maternal and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yuejuan
    Zhu, Xuhui
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (07) : 2592 - 2602
  • [46] Perinatal mortality and morbidity in triplet pregnancy according to chorionicity: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Curado, J.
    D'Antonio, F.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    Bhide, A.
    Thilaganathan, B.
    Khalil, A.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 54 (05) : 589 - 595
  • [47] Timing of induction of labor in suspected macrosomia: retrospective cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis
    Badr, D. A.
    Carlin, A.
    Kadji, C.
    Kang, X.
    Cannie, M. M.
    Jani, J. C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 64 (04) : 443 - 452
  • [48] Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Wei
    Wu, Teng
    Jin, Tianyu
    Zhang, Yuan
    Wang, Jing
    Qi, Jiaping
    Li, Yixuan
    Jiang, Huan
    Zhang, Ju
    Jiang, Zhaoyu
    Chen, Lin
    Ying, Zhenhua
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 42 (03) : 855 - 870
  • [49] Effect of prenatal aerobic exercises on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Veisy, Afsaneh
    Mohammad Alizadeh Charandabi, Sakineh
    Hematzadeh, Shahla
    Mirghafourvand, Mojgan
    NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (05): : 2301 - 2317
  • [50] Neonatal Adverse Outcomes of Induction and Expectant Management in Fetal Growth Restriction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Ting
    Wang, Yixiao
    Miao, Zhijing
    Lin, Yu
    Yu, Xiang
    Xie, Kaipeng
    Ding, Hongjuan
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2020, 8