Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Advance Care Planning Self-efficacy Scale for Physicians

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Yanan [1 ]
Bai, Zhiling [2 ]
Cheng, Lin [3 ]
Zheng, Qin [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Mil Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Nursing, Shanghai 201805, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pharm, Kunming, Peoples R China
[3] 926th Hosp Joint Logist Support Force Chinese Peop, Mil Patient Management Sect, Kaiyuan, Peoples R China
关键词
advance care planning; self-efficacy; reliability; validity; FAMILY-MEMBERS; ADAPTATION; LIFE; RECOMMENDATIONS; WILLINGNESS; TRANSLATION; DEFINITION; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1177/08258597231185679
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Chinese patients prefer physicians to initiate advance care planning (ACP) conversations, but there is no appropriate tool to evaluate physicians' ACP self-efficacy level in mainland China. This study aimed to translate the ACP self-efficacy scale into Chinese (ACP-SEc) and measure its psychometric properties among clinical physicians. Method The original scale was translated by literal translation, synthesis, and reverse translation, according to Brislin's translation model. Seven experts were invited to further revise the scale and evaluate the content validity. 348 physicians were conveniently sampled to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale from May to June 2021 in 7 tertiary hospitals. Results The ACP-SEc contained 17 items, 1 dimension, with a total score of 17 to 85 points. In this study, the critical ratios of the items ranged from 12.533 to 23.306, the item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.619 to 0.839. The item-content validity index ranged from 0.86 to 1.00, and the average scale-level content validity index was 0.98. In total, 75.507% of the total variance was explained by 1 common factor. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting indices of the modified model were desirable. The ACP-SEc was moderately correlated with General Self-Efficacy Scale (r = 0.675, P < .001), and it differentiated between physician groups based on the knowledge level of ACP, palliative care or ACP-related training experience, attitude toward ACP, willingness to initiate ACP discussions with patients, and experience of discussing ACP with family and friends, willingness to initiate ACP discussions with family and friends (P <.05). The total Cronbach's & alpha; and test-retest reliability of the scale were .960 and .976, respectively. Conclusion The ACP-SEc shows good reliability and validity, and it can be used to assess the ACP self-efficacy level of physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 46
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The reliability and validity of the greek version of the task-specific occupational self-efficacy scale
    Koumoundourou, GA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE & COUNSELLING, 2004, 32 (01) : 75 - 92
  • [32] Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the exercise self-efficacy scale in people with multiple sclerosis
    Goldoust, Faride
    Abolhasani, Maryam
    Shakibazadeh, Elham
    Yaseri, Mehdi
    Garmaroudi, Gholamreza
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2022, 11 (01) : 132
  • [33] Evidence of Validity and Reliability of the Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy Scale
    Diaz, Eduardo R.
    LATIN AMERICAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2022, 23 (02) : 127 - 140
  • [34] A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale
    Chesney, Margaret A.
    Neilands, Torsten B.
    Chambers, Donald B.
    Taylor, Jonelle M.
    Folkman, Susan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 11 : 421 - 437
  • [35] Testing the reliability and validity of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale
    Resnick, B
    Jenkins, LS
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2000, 49 (03) : 154 - 159
  • [36] The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale for College Students
    Changting Ju
    Ning Mo
    Wei Zhang
    Xu Jiang
    Jinfeng Xue
    Mindfulness, 2024, 15 : 616 - 630
  • [37] The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale for College Students
    Ju, Changting
    Mo, Ning
    Zhang, Wei
    Jiang, Xu
    Xue, Jinfeng
    MINDFULNESS, 2024, 15 (03) : 616 - 630
  • [38] Chinese version of the writing skills self-efficacy scale
    Xu, SS
    Yao, ML
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 240 - 240
  • [39] The hindi version of the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale-short form: Reliability and validity assessment
    Basu, Saurav
    Garg, Suneela
    Sharma, Akashdeep
    Arora, Ekta
    Singh, M. Meghachandra
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 2020, 45 (03) : 348 - 352
  • [40] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Situational Self-Efficacy Scale for Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Adolescents
    Kadioglu, Hasibe
    Erol, Saime
    Ergun, Ayse
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2015, 29 (04) : 273 - 275