Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Advance Care Planning Self-efficacy Scale for Physicians

被引:0
作者
Zhou, Yanan [1 ]
Bai, Zhiling [2 ]
Cheng, Lin [3 ]
Zheng, Qin [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Mil Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Nursing, Shanghai 201805, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pharm, Kunming, Peoples R China
[3] 926th Hosp Joint Logist Support Force Chinese Peop, Mil Patient Management Sect, Kaiyuan, Peoples R China
关键词
advance care planning; self-efficacy; reliability; validity; FAMILY-MEMBERS; ADAPTATION; LIFE; RECOMMENDATIONS; WILLINGNESS; TRANSLATION; DEFINITION; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1177/08258597231185679
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Chinese patients prefer physicians to initiate advance care planning (ACP) conversations, but there is no appropriate tool to evaluate physicians' ACP self-efficacy level in mainland China. This study aimed to translate the ACP self-efficacy scale into Chinese (ACP-SEc) and measure its psychometric properties among clinical physicians. Method The original scale was translated by literal translation, synthesis, and reverse translation, according to Brislin's translation model. Seven experts were invited to further revise the scale and evaluate the content validity. 348 physicians were conveniently sampled to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale from May to June 2021 in 7 tertiary hospitals. Results The ACP-SEc contained 17 items, 1 dimension, with a total score of 17 to 85 points. In this study, the critical ratios of the items ranged from 12.533 to 23.306, the item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.619 to 0.839. The item-content validity index ranged from 0.86 to 1.00, and the average scale-level content validity index was 0.98. In total, 75.507% of the total variance was explained by 1 common factor. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting indices of the modified model were desirable. The ACP-SEc was moderately correlated with General Self-Efficacy Scale (r = 0.675, P < .001), and it differentiated between physician groups based on the knowledge level of ACP, palliative care or ACP-related training experience, attitude toward ACP, willingness to initiate ACP discussions with patients, and experience of discussing ACP with family and friends, willingness to initiate ACP discussions with family and friends (P <.05). The total Cronbach's & alpha; and test-retest reliability of the scale were .960 and .976, respectively. Conclusion The ACP-SEc shows good reliability and validity, and it can be used to assess the ACP self-efficacy level of physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 46
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[11]   Dealing With Death Taboo: Discussion of Do-Not-Resuscitate Directives With Chinese Patients With Noncancer Life-Limiting Illnesses [J].
Cheng, Hon-Wai Benjamin ;
Shek, Pui-Shan Karen ;
Man, Ching-Wah ;
Chan, Oi-Man ;
Chan, Chun-Hung ;
Lai, Kit-Man ;
Cheng, Suk-Ching ;
Fung, Koon-Sim ;
Lui, W. K. ;
Lam, Carman ;
Ng, Yuen-Kwan ;
Wong, Wan-To ;
Wong, Cherry .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 36 (09) :760-766
[12]   Discrepancies among knowledge, practice, and attitudes towards advance care planning among Chinese clinical nurses: A national cross-sectional study [J].
Cheng, Qinqin ;
Liu, Xiangyu ;
Li, Xuying ;
Qing, Limin ;
Lin, Qin ;
Wen, Shiwu ;
Chen, Yongyi .
APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 58
[13]   Advance care planning in Asian culture [J].
Cheng, Shao-Yi ;
Lin, Cheng-Pei ;
Chan, Helen Yue-Lai ;
Martina, Diah ;
Mori, Masanori ;
Kim, Sun-Hyun ;
Ng, Raymond .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 50 (09) :976-989
[14]   How Acculturation Influences Attitudes about Advance Care Planning and End-of-Life Care among Chinese Living in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Australia [J].
Chiang, Fu-Ming ;
Wang, Ying-Wei ;
Hsieh, Jyh-Gang .
HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (11)
[15]   Advance care planning for frail older people in China: A discussion paper [J].
Deng, Ren-Li ;
Duan, Jia-Zhong ;
Zhang, Jiang-Hui ;
Miao, Jia-Rui ;
Chen, Liu-Liu ;
Lee, Diana T. F. .
NURSING ETHICS, 2019, 26 (06) :1696-1706
[16]  
Ding DZ., 2021, CHI J MOD NURS, V27, P733, DOI [10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200723-04557, DOI 10.3760/CMA.J.CN115682-20200723-04557]
[17]   The economic evidence for advance care planning: Systematic review of evidence [J].
Dixon, Josie ;
Matosevic, Tihana ;
Knapp, Martin .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (10) :869-884
[18]   Patient autonomy and participation in end-of-life decision-making: An interpretive-systemic focus group study on perspectives of Asian healthcare professionals [J].
Dutta, Oindrila ;
Lall, Priya ;
Patinadan, Paul Victor ;
Car, Josip ;
Low, Chan Kee ;
Tan, Woan Shin ;
Ho, Andy Hau Yan .
PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2020, 18 (04) :425-430
[19]   Nurses' self-efficacy, rather than their knowledge, is associated with their engagement in advance care planning in nursing homes: A survey study [J].
Gilissen, Joni ;
Pivodic, Lara ;
Wendrich-van Dael, Annelien ;
Cools, Wilfried ;
Vander Stichele, Robert ;
Van den Block, Lieve ;
Deliens, Luc ;
Gastmans, Chris .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (07) :917-924
[20]   Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Program in the Clinical Setting: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Hickman, Susan E. ;
Keevern, Elisabeth ;
Hammes, Bernard J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2015, 63 (02) :341-350