Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Xu, Ning [1 ]
Chen, Linmu [2 ]
Liu, Lulu [3 ]
Rong, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ, Dept Pain Med, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Weihai Cent Hosp, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0278846
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, and VIP databases, as well as dissertations and conference papers, to obtain randomized controlled trials comparing remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension before August 23, 2021. The primary outcomes included hemodynamic profiles, surgical field score, and blood loss. Extubation time, sedation and pain score at the PACU, and perioperative adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Nine randomized controlled trials with 543 patients (272 in the dexmedetomidine group and 271 in the remifentanil group) were eventually included. This meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in terms of surgical field score, blood loss, minimum values of mean arterial pressure (MD 0.24 with 95% CI [-1.65, 2.13], P = 0.80, I-2 = 66%) and heart rate (MD 0.42 [-1.33, 2.17], P = 0.64, I-2 = 40%), sedation scores at the PACU (MD -0.09 [-0.69, 0.50], P = 0.76, I-2 = 92%), and incidence of bradycardia (OR 2.24 [0.70, 7.15], P = 0.17, I-2 = 0%). Compared with remifentanil, dexmedetomidine as the controlled hypotensive agent showed a lower visual analogue score at the PACU (MD -1.01 [-1.25, -0.77], P<0.00001, I-2 = 0%) and incidence of shivering (OR 0.22 [0.08, 0.60], P = 0.003, I-2 = 0%), nausea, and vomiting (OR 0.34 [0.13, 0.89], P = 0.03, I-2 = 0%). However, extubation time was shorter in the remifentanil group (MD 3.34 [0.75, 5.93], P = 0.01, I-2 = 90%). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil are both effective in providing satisfactory controlled hypotension and surgical conditions. Dexmedetomidine is better in easing postoperative pain at the PACU and reducing the occurrence of shivering, nausea, and vomiting. Meanwhile, remifentanil is a fast-track anesthesia with a shorter extubation time. Given the limitations of this meta-analysis, further studies are needed for a more definitive comparison of the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] AHO MS, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V73, P112
  • [2] The efficacy of esmolol, remifentanil and nitroglycerin in controlled hypotension for functional endoscopic sinus surgery
    Alkan, Asli
    Honca, Mehtap
    Alkan, Ali
    Gulec, Handan
    Horasanli, Eyup
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 87 (03) : 255 - 259
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V343, pd5928, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.D5928
  • [4] EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN HUMANS .2. HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES
    BLOOR, BC
    WARD, DS
    BELLEVILLE, JP
    MAZE, M
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (06) : 1134 - 1142
  • [5] Camu F, 1999, ANESTH ANALG, V89, pS15, DOI 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00004
  • [6] Controlled hypotension for FESS: A randomised double-blinded comparison of magnesium sulphate and dexmedetomidine
    Chhabra, Alka
    Saini, Preeti
    Sharma, Karuna
    Chaudhary, Neelam
    Singh, Abhineet
    Gupta, Sunanda
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 64 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [7] Controlled hypotension - A guide to drug choice
    Degoute, Christian-Serge
    [J]. DRUGS, 2007, 67 (07) : 1053 - 1076
  • [8] The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans
    Ebert, TJ
    Hall, JE
    Barney, JA
    Uhrich, TD
    Colinco, MD
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (02) : 382 - 394
  • [9] Fanelli G, 1998, Minerva Anestesiol, V64, P313
  • [10] FROMME GA, 1986, ANESTH ANALG, V65, P683