Major increases in teachers' performance evaluations: Evidence from student evaluation of teaching surveys

被引:0
作者
Prieto, Jaime [1 ]
Guede-Cid, Rocko [1 ]
Cid-Cid, Ana I. [1 ]
Leguey, Santiago [1 ]
机构
[1] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Teacher evaluation; student evaluation; student evaluation of teaching; SET; teaching evaluation; higher education; university teaching; teacher performance evaluation; teaching excellence; SET surveys; UNIVERSITY; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.18543/tjhe.2299
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose: This exploratory study examined major increases in teachers' performance evaluations and their immediate impact on next year's score for those instructors that taught the same subject for at least two years in a row. The purpose was twofold. Firstly, to identify those Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) survey items associated with major increases in teacher evaluations. Secondly, to examine if there is evidence of the use of these SET results by instructors to improve their teaching.Design: The sample comprised SET survey ratings from one university over a five consecutive year period, for a total sample of 13,052 teacher evaluations and 3,893 teachers-subject observations under analysis. Frequency tables and Student's t-test were used for analysis.Findings: The results highlighted the three SET survey items captured by the dimension of teaching methodology as those most closely related to major increases in teacher evaluations. Regarding the second objective, the results show no generalised response from teachers who experience major increases in SET ratings. This suggeststhat the use of SET results is either limited or does not have an immediate measurable effect on student satisfaction. Originality/Value: To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to specifically examine major increases in teachers' performance evaluations and their immediate impact on next year's score based on evidence from SET surveys.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 125
页数:22
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11092-006-9000-9
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, QUAL HIGH EDUC, DOI DOI 10.1080/1353832032000151094
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, Ethical guidelines for educational research, V4th
  • [4] Questionnaire evaluating teaching competencies in the university environment. Evaluation of teaching competencies in the university
    Antonio Moreno-Murcia, Juan
    Silveira Torregrosa, Yolanda
    Belando Pedreno, Noelia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEW APPROACHES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (01) : 54 - +
  • [5] From performativity to professionalism: lecturers' responses to student feedback
    Arthur, Linet
    [J]. TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 14 (04) : 441 - 454
  • [6] Electronic course evaluations: Does an Online delivery system influence student evaluations?
    Avery, RJ
    Bryant, WK
    Mathios, A
    Kang, HJ
    Bell, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2006, 37 (01) : 21 - 37
  • [8] Ballantyne R., 2000, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V25, P221, DOI 10.1080/713611430
  • [9] University performance evaluations: what are we really measuring?
    Bedggood, Rowan E.
    Donovan, Jerome D.
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (07) : 825 - 842
  • [10] Instructors' perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction
    Beran, Tanya N.
    Rokosh, Jennifer L.
    [J]. INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (02) : 171 - 184