Prognostic Prediction of Cancer Based on Radiomics Features of Diagnostic Imaging: The Performance of Machine Learning Strategies

被引:9
作者
Tang, Fuk-hay [1 ]
Xue, Cheng [2 ]
Law, Maria Y. Y. [1 ]
Wong, Chui-ying [1 ,3 ]
Cho, Tze-hei [1 ]
Lai, Chun-kit [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tung Wah Coll, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Sanat Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Oncol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Radiomics; Prognostic prediction; Machine learning; IMAGES; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10278-022-00770-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Tumor phenotypes can be characterized by radiomics features extracted from images. However, the prediction accuracy is challenged by difficulties such as small sample size and data imbalance. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of machine learning strategies for the prediction of cancer prognosis. A total of 422 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) were selected from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The gross tumor volume (GTV) of each case was delineated from the respective CT images for radiomic features extraction. The samples were divided into 4 groups with survival endpoints of 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 7 years. The radiomic image features were analyzed with 6 different machine learning methods: decision tree (DT), boosted tree (BT), random forests (RF), support vector machine (SVM), generalized linear model (GLM), and deep learning artificial neural networks (DL-ANNs) with 70:30 cross-validation. The overall average prediction performance of the BT, RF, DT, SVM, GLM and DL-ANNs was AUC with 0.912, 0.938, 0.793, 0.746, 0.789 and 0.705 respectively. The RF and BT gave the best and second performance in the prediction. The DL-ANN did not show obvious advantage in predicting prognostic outcomes. Deep learning artificial neural networks did not show a significant improvement than traditional machine learning methods such as random forest and boosted trees. On the whole, the accurate outcome prediction using radiomics serves as a supportive reference for formulating treatment strategy for cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1090
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] analyticsvidhya, ANN VS CNN VS RNN TY
  • [2] Machine and deep learning methods for radiomics
    Avanzo, Michele
    Wei, Lise
    Stancanello, Joseph
    Vallieres, Martin
    Rao, Arvind
    Morin, Olivier
    Mattonen, Sarah A.
    El Naqa, Issam
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (05) : E185 - E202
  • [3] Classification of Hyperspectral Images With Regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis
    Bandos, Tatyana V.
    Bruzzone, Lorenzo
    Camps-Valls, Gustavo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 47 (03): : 862 - 873
  • [4] Computed Tomography Radiomics Predicts HPV Status and Local Tumor Control After Definitive Radiochemotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Bogowicz, Marta
    Riesterer, Oliver
    Ikenberg, Kristian
    Stieb, Sonja
    Moch, Holger
    Studer, Gabriela
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (04): : 921 - 928
  • [5] Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Boulesteix, Anne-Laure
    Janitza, Silke
    Kruppa, Jochen
    Koenig, Inke R.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2012, 2 (06) : 493 - 507
  • [6] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [7] Cheng Xue, 2020, Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2020. 23rd International Conference. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 12266), P579, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-59725-2_56
  • [8] The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
    Clark, Kenneth
    Vendt, Bruce
    Smith, Kirk
    Freymann, John
    Kirby, Justin
    Koppel, Paul
    Moore, Stephen
    Phillips, Stanley
    Maffitt, David
    Pringle, Michael
    Tarbox, Lawrence
    Prior, Fred
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (06) : 1045 - 1057
  • [9] Cortes C, 2004, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, V17
  • [10] Fh Tang, 2021, BJR Open, V3, P20200073, DOI 10.1259/bjro.20200073