Online reverse auctions research in marketing versus SCM: A review and future directions

被引:4
作者
Cortez, Roberto Mora
Cabanelas, Pablo [1 ]
Charterina, Jon
机构
[1] Southern Denmark Univ, Dept Entrepreneurship & Relationship Management, Kolding, Denmark
关键词
Reverse auctions; E-marketplace; Procurement auctions; Systematic review; BIDDING BEHAVIOR; PROCUREMENT; BUSINESS; INFORMATION; SUPPLIERS; IMPACT; COMPETITION; TECHNOLOGY; MECHANISMS; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.10.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An online reverse auction (ORA) is a dynamic procurement mechanism that allows suppliers to compete in real time via a platform to gain a buyer's business. The ORA is a technological tool introduced in the late 1990s, gaining proponents and detractors among practitioners and academics. Remarkably, while practitioner interest in ORAs has grown, related marketing and supply chain management (SCM) research has declined. This contradiction between theory and practice suggests the need to conduct a systematic review to provide readers with a state-of-the-art understanding of ORAs and recommend fruitful avenues for further research. We focus on the marketing literature and contrast the findings with SCM literature, in such an analysis practical relevance is stressed. Our study offers three main contributions: (1) integration of the cumulative marketing knowledge on ORAs in the 2002-2020 period, (2) development of a three-layer framework of the ORA domain (i.e., conceptualization, ORA as a process, and research setting), and (3) construction of a new research agenda to deal with scholarly challenges and emerging trends.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 454
页数:16
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Agndal H., 2007, Journal of business market management, V1, P187
[2]   An Experimental Investigation of Procurement Auctions with Asymmetric Sellers [J].
Aloysius, John ;
Deck, Cary ;
Hao, Li ;
French, Ryan .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 25 (10) :1763-1777
[3]   The buying center concept as a milestone in industrial marketing: Review and research agenda [J].
Cabanelas, Pablo ;
Cortez, Roberto Mora ;
Charterina, Jon .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 108 :65-78
[4]   Electronic reverse auction configuration and its impact on buyer price and supplier perceptions of opportunism: A laboratory experiment [J].
Carter, Craig R. ;
Stevens, Cynthia Kay .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2007, 25 (05) :1035-1054
[5]   An Investigation of the Average Bid Mechanism for Procurement Auctions [J].
Chang, Wei-Shiun ;
Chen, Bo ;
Salmon, Timothy C. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 61 (06) :1237-1254
[6]   Toward an Ethical Understanding of the Controversial Technology of Online Reverse Auctions [J].
Charki, Mohamed Hedi ;
Josserand, Emmanuel ;
Charki, Nabila Boukef .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 98 (01) :17-37
[7]  
Chartered Association of Business Schools (CABS), 2018, AC J GUID
[8]   Split-Award Auctions: Insights from Theory and Experiments [J].
Chaturvedi, Aadhaar ;
Katok, Elena ;
Beil, Damian R. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (01) :71-89
[9]   Better, faster, cheaper: An experimental analysis of a multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback [J].
Chen-Ritzo, CH ;
Harrison, TP ;
Kwasnica, AM ;
Thomas, DJ .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (12) :1753-1762
[10]   Revisiting the theory of business-to-business advertising [J].
Cortez, Roberto Mora ;
Gilliland, David, I ;
Johnston, Wesley J. .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 89 :642-656