Trade in green patents: How do green technologies flow in China?

被引:18
作者
Jiang, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Guofei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Key Lab Serv Sci & Innovat, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green technology diffusion; China; Patent licensing; Patent assignment; Social network analysis; FIRM PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECO-INNOVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; GEOGRAPHIC LOCALIZATION; PRODUCT INNOVATION; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; DETERMINANTS; ACHIEVEMENTS; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-023-10006-0
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Green technology transfer can help narrow the regional differences in green innovation, thereby contributing to a more coordinated green development. This study uses the social network analysis approach to explore the characteristics and regional differences in green technology diffusion in mainland China from 1985 to 2021. A unique dataset of patent transactions was used to construct green technology transfer networks. The findings demonstrate that energy-related technologies had the highest demand in the market. In addition, private sectors, especially multinational enterprises, were the most active network entities, whereas universities played a limited role in diffusion. Moreover, green patent transactions were highly localized and presented regional disparities. Resource-based regions with high pollution had lower green technology flows and formed a path dependence, whereas a few developed regions served as influential spreaders. The network exhibited a core-periphery pattern and dis-assortativity, thus creating a Matthew effect and widening the regional gaps. The absorbers and beginners tended to form connections with bilateral spillover, while peripheral provinces faced delinked risks. These findings help us understand the regional disparities and diffusion patterns of green technologies in China, thus accelerating the diffusion of green technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 856
页数:34
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]   Barriers to green innovation initiatives among manufacturers: the Malaysian case [J].
Abdullah, Mirza ;
Zailani, Suhaiza ;
Iranmanesh, Mohammad ;
Jayaraman, K. .
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 10 (04) :683-709
[2]   More than the resource curse: Exploring the nexus of natural resource abundance and environmental quality in northwestern China [J].
Ahmad, Fayyaz ;
Draz, Muhammad Umar ;
Chang, Wei-Yew ;
Yang, Su-Chang ;
Su, Lijuan .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 70
[3]   Developing green innovation performance by fostering of organizational knowledge and coopetitive relations [J].
Albort-Morant, Gema ;
Leal-Millan, Antonio ;
Cepeda-Carrion, Gabriel ;
Henseler, Jorg .
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 12 (02) :499-517
[4]   BUILDING STOCHASTIC BLOCKMODELS [J].
ANDERSON, CJ ;
WASSERMAN, S ;
FAUST, K .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1992, 14 (1-2) :137-161
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OECD Patent Statistics Manual, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264056442-EN
[6]  
Audretsch DB, 2017, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V42, P1030, DOI [10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8, 10.1007/s10961-014-9381-8]
[8]   The Geography of Complex Knowledge [J].
Balland, Pierre-Alexandre ;
Rigby, David .
ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 93 (01) :1-23
[9]   Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? [J].
Barbieri, Nicole ;
Marzucchi, Alberto ;
Rizzo, Ugo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (02)
[10]   A new centrality measure based on the negative and positive effects of clustering coefficient for identifying influential spreaders in complex networks [J].
Berahmand, Kamal ;
Bouyer, Asgarali ;
Samadi, Negin .
CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2018, 110 :41-54