At the last and with no margin: EU initiatives in the fight against modern slavery

被引:0
|
作者
Sales Pallares, Lorena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain
来源
ANUARIO ESPANOL DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PRIVADO | 2023年 / 23卷
关键词
FORCED LABOUR; DUE DILIGENCE; SLAVERY; PRODUCTS MADE WITH FORCED LABOUR;
D O I
10.19194/aedipr.23.13
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
As the deadline set by SDG 8 to eradicate forced labor by 2025 approaches, various community proposals aimed at combating slavery both within and beyond the community borders are emerging. The proposal for a Regulation on products made with forced labor, currently under legislative process, will serve as the starting point for reviewing the objective set by Ursula Von der Leyen of not allowing the trade of manufactured products originating from forced labor in the European market. This is not a regulation that can be analyzed independently, so the review of the proposal will require us to consider other norms that the EU is implementing in its fight against slavery, especially those related to due diligence, which are being processed in parallel to the text under analysis. While there are advantages to this approach, it does not hide the difficulties involved in such a comprehensive undertaking as proposed by the EU legislator.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 397
页数:25
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Adoption and transferability of joint interventions to fight modern slavery in food supply chains
    Kunz, Nathan
    Chesney, Thomas
    Trautrims, Alexander
    Gold, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2023, 258
  • [2] Network against modern slavery: De Jure or De Facto?
    de Moura, Paula Renata Castro Fonseca
    Arcanjo, Cecilia Braz
    Costa Cavalcante, Pedro Luiz
    ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA E GESTAO SOCIAL, 2020, 12 (04):
  • [3] WORK IN SIMILAR CONDITIONS TO SLAVERY IN BRAZIL: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND CHALLENGES IN THE FIGHT AGAINST VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
    Xavier Baez, Narciso Leandro
    Henrique Maisonnett, Luiz
    RATIO JURIS, 2016, 11 (22) : 143 - 165