Unveiling competence in the classroom: A multidimensional assessment of computer science teachers' self-efficacy in coding education

被引:0
作者
Sat, Mustafa [1 ]
Kadirhan, Zafer [2 ]
机构
[1] Kirikkale Univ, Fac Educ, Comp Educ & Instructional Technol, Kirikkale, Turkiye
[2] Ankara Univ, Fac Engn, Software Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Coding teaching self-efficacy scale (CTSES); Computer science education; Self-efficacy assessment; Coding instruction; Scale development; Teacher self-efficacy; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL THINKING; STUDENT; RELIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; VALIDITY; BELIEFS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-024-12503-7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The significance of teachers' self-efficacy in coding education within K-12 settings has grown substantially. However, the literature lacks subject-specific measurement tools tailored to assess teachers' self-efficacy in coding instruction. This study adopted a mixed methods approach to develop a reliable and valid instrument for measuring computer science (CS) teachers' self-efficacy in teaching coding. The scale development involved a rigorous process encompassing item generation, expert validation, and pilot testing. Importantly, this process unfolded in seven steps with two distinct phases, and each phase involved independent sample groups. Subsequently, a comprehensive survey was administered to two samples of CS teachers (n = 318, n = 295) to assess the scale's psychometric properties. The results revealed robust internal consistency and construct validity of the 20-item Coding Teaching Self-Efficacy Scale (CTSES) with four intercorrelated dimensions: student motivation, subject knowledge, classroom management, and material development. Furthermore, additional analyses revealed the significant impact of teaching experience and self-reported coding knowledge level on teachers' self-efficacy in teaching coding. The implications of this study hold significance for both practitioners and researchers to understand teachers' self-efficacy in teaching coding and to explore its relation to teacher training, curriculum development, and the broader advancement of coding education within school settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 29
页数:29
相关论文
共 74 条
[41]  
Kline R., 2010, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
[42]   A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS) [J].
Korkmaz, Ozgen ;
Cakir, Recep ;
Ozden, M. Yasar .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 72 :558-569
[43]  
Krajcik J, 2017, J SCI TEACH EDUC, V28, P1, DOI 10.1080/1046560X.2017.1279470
[44]  
Kunter M., 2006, Learning Environments Research, V9, P231, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10984-006-9015-7
[45]   Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? [J].
Lye, Sze Yee ;
Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 41 :51-61
[46]   Establishing content validity: Using qualitative and quantitative steps [J].
McKenzie, JF ;
Wood, ML ;
Kotecki, JE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 1999, 23 (04) :311-318
[47]   Computational thinking in K-12 education. An insight through meta-analysis [J].
Miguel Merino-Armero, Jose ;
Antonio Gonzalez-Calero, Jose ;
Cozar-Gutierrez, Ramon .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2022, 54 (03) :410-437
[48]  
Naureen, 2017, J ED ED DEV, V4, P48, DOI [DOI 10.22555/JOEED.V4I1.1050, 10.22555/joeed.v4i1.1050]
[49]   Self-efficacy or context dependency?: Exploring teachers' perceptions of and attitudes towards technology education [J].
Nordlof, Charlotta ;
Hallstrom, Jonas ;
Host, Gunnar E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2019, 29 (01) :123-141
[50]  
Nunnally, 1970, INTRO PSYCHOL MEASUR