Digital protractor as an intraoperative guide to cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty

被引:0
作者
Yi, Ning [1 ]
Yuan, Hang [2 ]
Xu, Nanwei [3 ]
Liu, Ruiping [3 ]
Wang, Yuji [3 ]
Zhuang, Chao [3 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Grad Sch, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Bengbu Med Coll, Bengbu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Changzhou Peoples Hosp 2, Dept Orthoped, Changzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Digital protractor; Anteversion; Total hip arthroplasty; Direct anterior approach; ACETABULAR COMPONENT ORIENTATION; POLYETHYLENE WEAR; ANTERIOR APPROACH; DISLOCATION; ACCURACY; NAVIGATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-023-02297-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction To explore if digital protractor could guide the anteversion of acetabular cup during primary THA and make it consistent with preoperative. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 172 cases of primary THA with direct anterior approach (DAA) over 2 years. The anteversion of acetabular cup were measured from computed tomography (CT) scan preoperative and de-identified plain radiographs postoperative by two blinded investigators who were not involved in the surgery. The effect of the digital protractor on the anteversion was determined using regression analysis. Results The mean anteversion for the THAs in digital protractor group was 15.5 degrees and 21.4 degrees in control group (P < 0.01). The mean anteversion bias for the THAs in digital protractor group was 1.59 degrees and 6.63 degrees in control group (P < 0.01). Regression analysis identified a 10.7% difference in anteversion due to the use of digital protractor (P < 0.01), and THAs performed without digital protractor were six times more likely to result in anteversion of > 25 degrees. The correlation coefficient for the interobserver reliability of the measurement of the two investigators was 0.94. Conclusion The digital protractor is a practical tool in the DAA for THA to determine the anteversion of the acetabular prosthesis.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Is the transverse acetabular ligament a reliable cup orientation guide? Computer simulation in 160 hips [J].
Abe, Hirohito ;
Sakai, Takashi ;
Hamasaki, Toshimitsu ;
Takao, Masaki ;
Nishii, Takashi ;
Nakamura, Nobuo ;
Sugano, Nobuhiko .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2012, 83 (05) :474-480
[2]   Intraoperative pelvic motion in total hip arthroplasty [J].
Asayama, I ;
Akiyoshi, Y ;
Naito, M ;
Ezoe, M .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (08) :992-997
[3]  
Barrack Robert L, 2003, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V11, P89
[4]  
Biedermann R, 2005, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V87B, P762, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6
[5]  
Bosker B., 2007, ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU, V127, P375
[6]   Soft-tissue changes in hip abductor muscles and tendons after total hip replacement COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DIRECT ANTERIOR AND THE TRANSGLUTEAL APPROACHES [J].
Bremer, A. K. ;
Kalberer, F. ;
Pfirrmann, C. W. A. ;
Dora, C. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (07) :886-889
[7]   Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position [J].
Dorr, Lawrence A. ;
Malik, Aamer ;
Wan, Zhinian ;
Long, William T. ;
Harris, Michael .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (465) :92-99
[8]  
DORR LD, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P151
[9]   Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement [J].
Hassan, DM ;
Johnston, GHF ;
Dust, WNC ;
Watson, G ;
Dolovich, AT .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (01) :80-84
[10]   Orientation of the acetabular component - A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique [J].
Honl, M. ;
Schwieger, K. ;
Salineros, M. ;
Jacobs, J. ;
Morlock, M. ;
Wimmer, M. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (10) :1401-1405