Interprofessional clinical decision-making process in health: A scoping review

被引:7
作者
Bouchez, Tiphanie [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Cagnon, Clemence [1 ]
Hamouche, Gouraya [1 ]
Majdoub, Marouan [1 ]
Charlet, Jean [2 ,3 ]
Schuers, Matthieu [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cote Azur, Dept Educ & Res Gen Practice, RETINES, HLTH, Nice, France
[2] Univ Sorbonne Paris Nord, Sorbonne Univ, INSERM, LIMICS, Paris, France
[3] Assistance Publ Hop Paris, DRCI, Paris, France
[4] Univ Rouen, Dept Gen Practice, Rouen, France
[5] Acad Hosp Rouen, Dept Med Informat, Rouen, France
[6] Univ Cote Azur, Fac Med, Dept Enseignement & Rech Med Gen, 28, Ave Valombrose, F-06107 Nice 2, France
关键词
decision-making; group process; interprofessional relations; literature review; nurses; patient care team; physicians; rehabilitation; scoping review; social workers; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; MULTIDISCIPLINARY CANCER TEAMS; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; SOCIAL-WORKERS; PHYSICIAN COLLABORATION; PALLIATIVE CARE; NURSE; PATIENT; COMMUNICATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/jan.15865
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimsTo describe the key elements of the interprofessional decision-making process in health, based on published scientific studies. To describe the authors, reviews and subject matter of those publications.DesignScoping review of the literature.Data SourcesMEDLINE, APA Psycinfo OpenGrey, Lissa and Cochrane databases were searched in December 2019 and January 2023.Review MethodsReferences were considered eligible if they (i) were written in French or English, (ii) concerned health, (iii) studied a clinical decision-making process, (iv) were performed in an interprofessional context. 'PRISMA-scoping review' guidelines were respected. The eligible studies were analysed and classified by an inductive approachResultsWe identified 1429 sources of information, 145 of which were retained for the analysis. Based on these studies, we identified five key elements of interprofessional decision-making in health. The process was found to be influenced by group dynamics, the available information and consideration of the unique characteristics of the patient. An organizational framework and specific training favoured improvements in the process.ConclusionDecision-making can be based on a willingness of the healthcare organization to promote models based on more shared leadership and to work on professional roles and values. It also requires healthcare professionals trained in the entire continuum of collaborative practices, to meet the unique needs of each patient. Finally, it appears essential to favour the sharing of multiple sources of accessible and structured information. Tools for knowledge formalization should help to optimize interprofessional decision-making in health.ImpactThe quality of a team decision-making is critical to the quality of care. Interprofessional decision-making can be structured and improved through different levels of action. These improvements could benefit to patients and healthcare professionals in every settings of care involving care collaboration.Impact StatementInterprofessional decision-making in health is an essential lever of quality of care, especially for the most complex patients which are a contemporary challenge. This scoping review article offers a synthesis of a large corpus of data published to date about the interprofessional clinical decision-making process in healthcare. It has the potential to provide a global vision, practical data and a list of references to facilitate the work of healthcare teams, organizations and teachers ready to initiate a change.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 907
页数:24
相关论文
共 178 条
[51]   Six habits to enhance MET performance under stress: A discussion paper reviewing team mechanisms for improved patient outcomes [J].
Fein, Erich C. ;
Mackie, Benjamin ;
Chernyak-Hai, Lily ;
O'Quinn, C. Richard V. ;
Ahmed, Ezaz .
AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 29 (02) :104-109
[52]   Discrepancies between perceptions by physicians and nursing staff of intensive care unit end-of-life decisions [J].
Ferrand, E ;
Lemaire, FO ;
Regnier, B ;
Kuteifan, K ;
Badet, M ;
Asfar, P ;
Jaber, S ;
Chagnon, JL ;
Renault, A ;
Robert, R ;
Pochard, F ;
Herve, C ;
Brun-Buisson, C ;
Duvaldestin, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 167 (10) :1310-1315
[53]   Referring to psychological therapy services in secondary NHS mental health services - how do mental health care professionals decide? [J].
Fiddick, Lucy ;
Neale, Emily ;
Nathwani, Falguni ;
Bennert, Kristina ;
Gregory, James .
MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW JOURNAL, 2020, 25 (02) :185-196
[54]   Identification of core ethical topics for interprofessional education in the intensive care unit: a thematic analysis [J].
Firn, Janice ;
Rui, Crystal ;
Vercler, Christian ;
De Vries, Raymond ;
Shuman, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2020, 34 (04) :453-460
[55]   Getting work done: a grounded theory study of resident physician value of nursing communication [J].
Forbes, Thompson H., III ;
Larson, Kim ;
Scott, Elaine S. ;
Garrison, Herbert G. .
JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2020, 34 (02) :225-232
[56]   The dialogue as decision support; lived experiences of extended collaboration when an ambulance is called [J].
Forsgarde, Elin-Sofie ;
Svensson, Anders ;
Roost, Mattias ;
Fridlund, Bengt ;
Elmqvist, Carina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES ON HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, 2021, 16 (01)
[57]   The negotiation of sharing leadership in the context of professional hierarchy: Interactions on interprofessional teams [J].
Fox, Stephanie ;
Comeau-Vallee, Mariline .
LEADERSHIP, 2020, 16 (05) :568-591
[58]  
Fratianne R B, 1992, J Burn Care Rehabil, V13, P600, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199209000-00018
[59]  
Friedman O. R., 2020, DISSERT ABSTR
[60]  
Gair G, 2001, J Nurs Manag, V9, P3, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2001.00200.x