Interprofessional clinical decision-making process in health: A scoping review

被引:4
作者
Bouchez, Tiphanie [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Cagnon, Clemence [1 ]
Hamouche, Gouraya [1 ]
Majdoub, Marouan [1 ]
Charlet, Jean [2 ,3 ]
Schuers, Matthieu [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cote Azur, Dept Educ & Res Gen Practice, RETINES, HLTH, Nice, France
[2] Univ Sorbonne Paris Nord, Sorbonne Univ, INSERM, LIMICS, Paris, France
[3] Assistance Publ Hop Paris, DRCI, Paris, France
[4] Univ Rouen, Dept Gen Practice, Rouen, France
[5] Acad Hosp Rouen, Dept Med Informat, Rouen, France
[6] Univ Cote Azur, Fac Med, Dept Enseignement & Rech Med Gen, 28, Ave Valombrose, F-06107 Nice 2, France
关键词
decision-making; group process; interprofessional relations; literature review; nurses; patient care team; physicians; rehabilitation; scoping review; social workers; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; MULTIDISCIPLINARY CANCER TEAMS; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; SOCIAL-WORKERS; PHYSICIAN COLLABORATION; PALLIATIVE CARE; NURSE; PATIENT; COMMUNICATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/jan.15865
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimsTo describe the key elements of the interprofessional decision-making process in health, based on published scientific studies. To describe the authors, reviews and subject matter of those publications.DesignScoping review of the literature.Data SourcesMEDLINE, APA Psycinfo OpenGrey, Lissa and Cochrane databases were searched in December 2019 and January 2023.Review MethodsReferences were considered eligible if they (i) were written in French or English, (ii) concerned health, (iii) studied a clinical decision-making process, (iv) were performed in an interprofessional context. 'PRISMA-scoping review' guidelines were respected. The eligible studies were analysed and classified by an inductive approachResultsWe identified 1429 sources of information, 145 of which were retained for the analysis. Based on these studies, we identified five key elements of interprofessional decision-making in health. The process was found to be influenced by group dynamics, the available information and consideration of the unique characteristics of the patient. An organizational framework and specific training favoured improvements in the process.ConclusionDecision-making can be based on a willingness of the healthcare organization to promote models based on more shared leadership and to work on professional roles and values. It also requires healthcare professionals trained in the entire continuum of collaborative practices, to meet the unique needs of each patient. Finally, it appears essential to favour the sharing of multiple sources of accessible and structured information. Tools for knowledge formalization should help to optimize interprofessional decision-making in health.ImpactThe quality of a team decision-making is critical to the quality of care. Interprofessional decision-making can be structured and improved through different levels of action. These improvements could benefit to patients and healthcare professionals in every settings of care involving care collaboration.Impact StatementInterprofessional decision-making in health is an essential lever of quality of care, especially for the most complex patients which are a contemporary challenge. This scoping review article offers a synthesis of a large corpus of data published to date about the interprofessional clinical decision-making process in healthcare. It has the potential to provide a global vision, practical data and a list of references to facilitate the work of healthcare teams, organizations and teachers ready to initiate a change.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 907
页数:24
相关论文
共 178 条
[1]   Understanding collaboration between social workers and physicians: Application of a typology [J].
Abramson, JS ;
Mizrahi, T .
SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 37 (02) :71-100
[2]   Training the Next Generation of Physician-Executives: An Innovative Residency Pathway in Management and Leadership [J].
Ackerly, D. Clay ;
Sangvai, Devdutta G. ;
Udayakumar, Krishna ;
Shah, Bimal R. ;
Kalman, Noah S. ;
Cho, Alex H. ;
Schulman, Kevin A. ;
Fulkerson, William J., Jr. ;
Dzau, Victor J. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2011, 86 (05) :575-579
[3]   Challenges Faced by Social Workers as Members of Interprofessional Collaborative Health Care Teams [J].
Ambrose-Miller, Wayne ;
Ashcroft, Rachelle .
HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 2016, 41 (02) :101-109
[4]   Capitalizing on Synergies-A Discourse Analysis of the Process of Collaboration Among Providers of Integrative Health Care [J].
Andermo, Susanne ;
Sundberg, Tobias ;
Forsberg, Christina ;
Falkenberg, Torkel .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03)
[5]   Descriptions by General Practitioners and Nurses of Their Collaboration in Continuous Sedation Until Death at Home: In-Depth Qualitative Interviews in Three European Countries [J].
Anquinet, Livia ;
Rietjens, Judith A. ;
Mathers, Nigel ;
Seymour, Jane ;
van der Heide, Agnes ;
Deliens, Luc .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2015, 49 (01) :99-110
[6]  
Aquila Anne, 2003, J Vasc Nurs, V21, P35, DOI 10.1067/mvn.2003.4
[7]   Association between nurse-physician collaboration and patient outcomes in three intensive care units [J].
Baggs, JG ;
Schmitt, MH ;
Mushlin, AI ;
Mitchell, PH ;
Eldredge, DH ;
Oakes, D ;
Hutson, AD .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (09) :1991-1998
[8]   INTENSIVE-CARE DECISIONS ABOUT LEVEL OF AGGRESSIVENESS OF CARE [J].
BAGGS, JG ;
SCHMITT, MH .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1995, 18 (04) :345-355
[9]   DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE COLLABORATION AND SATISFACTION ABOUT CARE DECISIONS [J].
BAGGS, JG .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1994, 20 (01) :176-182
[10]   Intensive care unit cultures and end-of-life decision making [J].
Baggs, Judith Gedney ;
Norton, Sally A. ;
Schmitt, Madeline H. ;
Dombeck, Mary T. ;
Setters, Craig R. ;
Quinn, Jill R. .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 22 (02) :159-168