Deep Learning Algorithm for Tumor Segmentation and Discrimination of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients with Prostate Cancer

被引:4
作者
Hong, Sujin [1 ]
Kim, Seung Ho [1 ]
Yoo, Byeongcheol [2 ]
Kim, Joo Yeon [3 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Haeundae Paik Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Busan, South Korea
[2] Deepnoid Co Ltd, Seoul 08376, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Haeundae Paik Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Busan 48108, South Korea
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); prostate cancer; Gleason score; deep learning; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol30080528
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We investigated the feasibility of a deep learning algorithm (DLA) based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for the segmentation and discrimination of clinically significant cancer (CSC, Gleason score & GE; 7) from non-CSC in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Data from a total of 149 consecutive patients who had undergone 3T-MRI and been pathologically diagnosed with PCa were initially collected. The labelled data (148 images for GS6, 580 images for GS7) were applied for tumor segmentation using a convolutional neural network (CNN). For classification, 93 images for GS6 and 372 images for GS7 were used. For external validation, 22 consecutive patients from five different institutions (25 images for GS6, 70 images for GS7) representing different MR machines were recruited. Results: Regarding segmentation and classification, U-Net and DenseNet were used, respectively. The tumor Dice scores for internal and external validation were 0.822 and 0.7776, respectively. As for classification, the accuracies of internal and external validation were 73 and 75%, respectively. For external validation, diagnostic predictive values for CSC (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) were 84, 48, 82 and 52%, respectively. Conclusions: Tumor segmentation and discrimination of CSC from non-CSC is feasible using a DLA developed based on ADC maps (b2000) alone.
引用
收藏
页码:7275 / 7285
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A Deep Learning-Based Approach for the Detection and Localization of Prostate Cancer in T2 Magnetic Resonance Images [J].
Alkadi, Ruba ;
Taher, Fatma ;
El-baz, Ayman ;
Werghi, Naoufel .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2019, 32 (05) :793-807
[2]   Clinically significant prostate cancer detection and segmentation in low-risk patients using a convolutional neural network on multi-parametric MRI [J].
Arif, Muhammad ;
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Castillo Tovar, Jose ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Krestin, Gabriel P. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Niessen, Wiro ;
Veenland, Jifke F. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (12) :6582-6592
[3]   PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists [J].
Bhayana, Rajesh ;
O'Shea, Aileen ;
Anderson, Mark A. ;
Bradley, William R. ;
Gottumukkala, Ravi, V ;
Mojtahed, Amirkasra ;
Pierce, Theodore T. ;
Harisinghani, Mukesh .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (01) :141-151
[4]   Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy [J].
Borghesi, Marco ;
Ahmed, Hashim ;
Nam, Robert ;
Schaeffer, Edward ;
Schiavina, Riccardo ;
Taneja, Samir ;
Weidner, Wolfgang ;
Loeb, Stacy .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (03) :353-365
[5]   Why Is a b-value Range of 1500-2000 s/mm2 Optimal for Evaluating Prostatic Index Lesions on Synthetic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging? [J].
Cha, So Yeon ;
Kim, EunJu ;
Park, Sung Yoon .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (06) :922-930
[6]   Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement [J].
Chen, Ronald C. ;
Rumble, R. Bryan ;
Loblaw, D. Andrew ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Ehdaie, Behfar ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Morgan, Scott C. ;
Tyldesley, Scott ;
Haluschak, John J. ;
Tan, Winston ;
Justman, Stewart ;
Jain, Suneil .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (18) :2182-+
[7]   Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: The Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis [J].
Cohen, Michael S. ;
Hanley, Robert S. ;
Kurteva, Teodora ;
Ruthazer, Robin ;
Silverman, Mark L. ;
Sorcini, Andrea ;
Hamawy, Karim ;
Roth, Robert A. ;
Tuerk, Ingolf ;
Libertino, John A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (02) :371-381
[8]   Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence [J].
Corcoran, Niall M. ;
Hong, Matthew K. H. ;
Casey, Rowan G. ;
Hurtado-Coll, Antonio ;
Peters, Justin ;
Harewood, Laurence ;
Goldenberg, S. Larry ;
Hovens, Chris M. ;
Costello, Anthony J. ;
Gleave, Martin E. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) :E202-E210
[9]   MEASURES OF THE AMOUNT OF ECOLOGIC ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SPECIES [J].
DICE, LR .
ECOLOGY, 1945, 26 (03) :297-302
[10]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252