Student engagement in hybrid approaches to teaching in higher education

被引:1
作者
van der Rijst, Roeland [1 ]
Guo, Pengyue [2 ]
Admiraal, Wilfried [3 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, ICLON Grad Sch Teaching, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Ankang Univ, Sch Educ, Ankang, Peoples R China
[3] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Ctr Study Profess, Pilestredet 40, N-0170 Oslo, Norway
来源
RIE-REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION EDUCATIVA | 2023年 / 41卷 / 02期
关键词
hybrid teaching; student engagement; higher education; evaluation; LEARNING-ENVIRONMENT; MOTIVATION; EXPERIENCES; INSTRUCTION; AUTONOMY; MODEL;
D O I
10.6018/rie.562521
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Prospective benefits of hybrid teaching arrangements have attracted attention of many educational administrators of higher education institutes (HEIs). Hybrid teaching is a teach-ing format in which some students and the teachers are physically present on campus, while at the same time other students are present online. The prospective benefits of this type of education are that students can choose to participate online or in class. This study examines student engagement and motivation in hybrid teaching in various disciplinary settings. Student engagement and motivation were measured through questionnaires and semi-structured inter-views with students. Teachers shared their experience with hybrid teaching in semi-structured interviews. The analysis of the questionnaire data showed that both on-campus and online students who attend classes with autonomous motivation showed more classroom engagement and more classroom interaction than students with less autonomous motivation. The analysis of the interview transcripts provided in-depth insight into the engagement and interaction of students and teachers in hybrid teaching settings. The interviews revealed that interactions with online students were less frequent and less powerful than with their on-campus peers. As not all learning objectives can best be met with a hybrid arrangement, it is advisable to use hybrid teaching arrangement only for those courses that cannot be taught at the campus only.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 336
页数:22
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Astin AW, 1999, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V40, P518
[2]  
Bell J., 2014, International Journal of Designs for Learning, V5, P68
[3]  
Biesta G., 2010, Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy
[4]   What constitutes the good of education? Reflections on the possibility of educational critique [J].
Biesta, Gert .
EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY, 2020, 52 (10) :1023-1027
[5]   Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map [J].
Bond, Melissa ;
Buntins, Katja ;
Bedenlier, Svenja ;
Zawacki-Richter, Olaf ;
Kerres, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 17 (01)
[6]   Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis [J].
Bower, Matt ;
Dalgarno, Barney ;
Kennedy, Gregor E. ;
Lee, Mark J. W. ;
Kenney, Jacqueline .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2015, 86 :1-17
[7]   Evaluating the link between attendance and performance in higher education: the role of classroom engagement dimensions [J].
Buechele, Stefan .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (01) :132-150
[8]   The Impact of Emotions on Student Achievement in Synchronous Hybrid Business and Public Administration Programs: A Longitudinal Test of Control-Value Theory [J].
Butz, Nikolaus T. ;
Stupnisky, Robert H. ;
Pekrun, Reinhard ;
Jensen, Jason L. ;
Harsell, Dana M. .
DECISION SCIENCES-JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE EDUCATION, 2016, 14 (04) :441-474
[9]   A mixed methods study of graduate students' self-determined motivation in synchronous hybrid learning environments [J].
Butz, Nikolaus T. ;
Stupnisky, Robert H. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 28 :85-95
[10]   Oral communication skills assessment in a synchronous hybrid MBA programme: does attending face-to-face matter for US and international students? [J].
Butz, Nikolaus T. ;
Askim-Lovseth, Mary K. .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 40 (04) :624-639