Grassroots innovation: A review and a meta-theoretical sustainability assessment framework

被引:2
作者
Troullaki, Katerina [1 ]
Rozakis, Stelios [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Crete, Sch Chem & Environm Engn, Bioecon & Biosyst Econ Lab, Khania 73100, Greece
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Radical innovation; Grassroots innovation; Sustainability assessment; Sustainable business models; Sustainability transitions; Literature review; COMMUNITY ENERGY; SYSTEMS; NICHE; PERSPECTIVE; TRANSFORMATION; TRANSITIONS; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2024.100822
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Diverse discourses converge into the importance of broadening the focus of sustainability innovations from merely cleaner technologies to more radical, paradigmatic innovations. Here, we focus on grassroots innovation (GI) as a radical innovation paradigm whose agents, goals and practices are fundamentally different from conventional innovation. Researchers typically attribute GIs the potential to influence the transition toward more sustainable production and consumption. Through a systematic literature review, we find that a research gap in the systematic analysis of GIs' sustainability persists. We thus propose a meta-theoretical framework to systematise the sustainability assessment of GIs across three system levels: product, organisational model and socio-technical system. Our framework delineates how the theory and tools from sustainability assessment and sustainable business models may enrich sustainability transitions studies in the analysis of grassroots, and more broadly, radical innovation, providing a systems thinking view and increasing the credibility and reflexivity of sustainability arguments in transition studies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Aagaard A., 2021, Business Models for Sustainability Transitions: How Organisations Contribute to Societal Transformation, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-77580-3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-77580-3]
[2]   Futures of sustainability: Trajectories and conflicts [J].
Adloff, Frank ;
Neckel, Sighard .
SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, 2021, 60 (02) :159-167
[3]   The ?bioeconomics vs bioeconomy? debate: Beyond criticism, advancing research fronts [J].
Allain, Sandrine ;
Ruault, Jean-Francois ;
Moraine, Marc ;
Madelrieux, Sophie .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2022, 42 :58-73
[4]   A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach [J].
Arnold, Ross D. ;
Wade, Jon P. .
2015 CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2015, 44 :669-678
[5]   Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: moving beyond efficiency [J].
Bengtsson, Magnus ;
Alfredsson, Eva ;
Cohen, Maurie ;
Lorek, Sylvia ;
Schroeder, Patrick .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (06) :1533-1547
[6]  
Benkler Yochai, 2006, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
[7]  
Bergek A., 2008, Functions in Innovation Systems: A Framework for Analyzing Energy System Dynamics and Identifying Goals for System-Building Activities by Entrepreneurs and Policy Makers
[8]   Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Sustainability and Value Assessment in Early PSS Design [J].
Bertoni, Marco .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (07)
[9]   Design principles for sustainability assessments in the business model innovation process [J].
Bhatnagar, Rishi ;
Keskin, Duygu ;
Kirkels, Arjan ;
Romme, A. Georges L. ;
Huijben, J. C. C. M. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 377
[10]   The Dark Side of Transformation: Latent Risks in Contemporary Sustainability Discourse [J].
Blythe, Jessica ;
Silver, Jennifer ;
Evans, Louisa ;
Armitage, Derek ;
Bennett, Nathan J. ;
Moore, Michele-Lee ;
Morrison, Tiffany H. ;
Brown, Katrina .
ANTIPODE, 2018, 50 (05) :1206-1223