The principal-agent problem in hierarchical policy making: A failure of policy to support the transition to LNG as an alternative shipping fuel

被引:5
作者
Monios, Jason [1 ]
Fedi, Laurent [1 ]
机构
[1] Domaine Luminy, Kedge Business Sch, BP 921, F-13288 Marseille 9, France
关键词
Principal-agent problem; Maritime transport policy; Liquefied natural gas (LNG); Shipping; Alternative fuels; Governance; Seaports; Sustainability; Agency theory; LIQUEFIED NATURAL-GAS; DECISION-MAKING; GOVERNANCE; IMPLEMENTATION; SITUATIONS; SYSTEM; MODEL; RISK; EU;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105846
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the role of policy in driving technology change to reduce maritime transport emissions. While liquefied natural gas (LNG) is little better than fuel oil from a carbon perspective, it emits very low levels of other pollutants Sulphur Oxides (SOx), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Particulate Matter (PM). However, despite a great deal of policy effort, the switch from fuel oil to LNG has not occurred at significant scale. Policy makers are already turning towards other fuels such as hydrogen. This paper explores the failure of policy to support the transition to LNG through the lens of the principal-agent problem, examining the influence of its key challenges at the intersection of three geographical scales (international, supranational and national) in the European Union. The case analysis reveals a lack of incentive alignment between both different levels of public actors (the EU and member states) and between public and private actors, producing a lack of agency and an uncertain policy environment, exacerbated by a lack of monitoring and sanctions by the EU of its member states. This research provides a better understanding of the shortcomings of transition policy in the case of LNG which provides lessons on the need for more coherent, comprehensive and stringent policy that could prevent another policy failure in the transition towards other alternative fuels.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Alphaliner, 2022, Monthly Monitor
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1978, UN Treaty Series
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Digital Agenda for EuropeRebooting Europes Economy, P8, DOI [DOI 10.2775/41229, 10.2775/41229]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Review of Maritime Transport
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, The Development of European Identity/Identities: Unfinished Business-A Policy Review, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, P1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, LNG in Europe 2018: An Overview of LNG Import Terminals in Europe
[7]  
Argus Media, 2019, Q&A: IMO 2020 policing unlikely before March
[8]   IMO off course for decarbonisation of shipping? Three challenges for stricter policy [J].
Bach, Hanna ;
Hansen, Teis .
MARINE POLICY, 2023, 147
[9]   Conditionalities and the Performance of European Structural Funds: A Principal-Agent Analysis of Control Mechanisms in European Union Cohesion Policy [J].
Bachtler, John ;
Ferry, Martin .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2015, 49 (08) :1258-1273
[10]   How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies [J].
Balcombe, Paul ;
Brierley, James ;
Lewis, Chester ;
Skatvedt, Line ;
Speirs, Jamie ;
Hawkes, Adam ;
Staffell, Iain .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 182 :72-88