Prediction of Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) of CO2-Crude Oil System Based on GWO-RBF Neural Network

被引:3
作者
Sun, Bowen [1 ]
Guo, Ping [1 ]
Song, Yilun [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Petr Univ, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploita, Chengdu 610500, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NEW ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY | 2023年 / 1017卷
关键词
Minimum miscibility pressure; CO2; flooding; GWO algorithm; RBF neural network; Prediction; CO2; DESIGN; FLOOD;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-99-0553-9_78
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Accurately evaluating the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of CO2-crude oil systems is a critical problem in the design of CO2 miscible flooding of reservoirs. Based on optimization algorithm and artificial intelligence model, a novel model integrating grey wolf optimizer (GWO) algorithm and radial basis function (RBF) neural network is built through measuredMMPdata fitting, which is named GWO-RBF. On the basis of Spearman rank correlation analysis, the proposed model selects reservoir temperature, oil C5+ molecular weight and mole fraction of intermediate oil components (C-2-C-4, CO2, H2S) as the independent variables. The GWO-RBF model parameters (base function width s, hidden layer node number M) are optimized using 40 sets of published CO2-crude oil system MMP data. Prediction is performed on extra 10 sets of non-training MMP data. The results show that the average absolute relative deviation (AARD) of the GWORBF model is 2.73% on training sets, while the AARD of model prediction is only 3.11%. On training and prediction sets, the maximum absolute relative deviations (ARDs) are 8.30% and 9.99%, respectively, while the minimum ARDs are 0.19% and 0.00%.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / 770
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Al-Ajmi M., 2009, SOC PETR ENG KUW INT
[2]   CO2 MINIMUM MISCIBILITY PRESSURE - A CORRELATION FOR IMPURE CO2 STREAMS AND LIVE OIL SYSTEMS [J].
ALSTON, RB ;
KOKOLIS, GP ;
JAMES, CF .
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1985, 25 (02) :268-274
[3]   LABORATORY DESIGN OF A GRAVITY-STABLE MISCIBLE CO2 PROCESS [J].
CARDENAS, RL ;
ALSTON, RB ;
NUTE, AJ ;
KOKOLIS, GP .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1984, 36 (01) :111-118
[4]  
Clark N.J., 1958, Journal of Petroleum Technology, V10, P11
[5]   EVALUATION AND DESIGN OF A CO2 MISCIBLE FLOOD PROJECT - SACROC UNIT, KELLY-SNYDER FIELD [J].
DICHARRY, RM ;
PERRYMAN, TL ;
RONQUILLE, JD .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1973, 25 (NOV) :1309-1318
[6]   A comparison of CO2 minimum miscibility pressure determinations for Weyburn crude oil [J].
Dong, MZ ;
Huang, S ;
Dyer, SB ;
Mourits, FM .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 31 (01) :13-22
[7]  
Eakin B E., 1988, ANN TECHNICAL C EXHI, DOI DOI 10.2118/18065-MS
[8]   CARBON-DIOXIDE FLOODING EVALUATION OF HIGH-POUR-POINT, PARAFFINIC RED WASH RESERVOIR OIL [J].
FRIMODIG, JP ;
REESE, NA ;
WILLIAMS, CA .
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1983, 23 (04) :587-594
[9]   THE EFFECT OF PHASE-BEHAVIOR ON CO2-FLOOD DISPLACEMENT EFFICIENCY [J].
GARDNER, JW ;
ORR, FM ;
PATEL, PD .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 33 (11) :2067-2081
[10]   STUDY OF A POSSIBLE CO2 FLOOD IN RANGELY-FIELD [J].
GRAUE, DJ ;
ZANA, ET .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 33 (07) :1312-1318