Rehabilitating Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection: Theory and Evidence

被引:0
作者
Auer, Benjamin R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schuhmacher, Frank [4 ]
Kohrs, Hendrik [5 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Finance, Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
[3] CESifo, Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Leipzig, Finance, Leipzig, Germany
[5] VNG Handel & Vertrieb GmbH, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
EXPECTED UTILITY; SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; OPTIMIZATION; RISK; RETURNS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Recent research has proven that the application of mean-variance portfolio selection is justified if, and only if, asset returns follow a skew-elliptical generalized location and scale (SEGLS) distribution. This irrefutably corrects the widespread fallacy that mean-variance analysis can be used only for portfolios with normally or symmetrically distributed constituents. To make this important finding accessible to a wide range of academics and practitioners, the authors of this article present it in a nontechnical form and additionally highlight that, under the SEGLS distribution and some mild axiomatic requirements, mean-variance analysis and many alternative mean-risk approaches deliver the same optimal portfolios. In a numerical study, they illustrate the key features of the novel SEGLS distribution. In an empirical study, they emphasize its practical relevance by gathering existing and providing new evidence in its favor.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 178
页数:20
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Does the choice of fund performance measure matter? [J].
Adcock, Christopher ;
Areal, Nelson ;
Cortez, Maria Ceu ;
Oliveira, Benilde ;
Silva, Florinda .
INVESTMENT ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2020, 49 (01) :53-77
[2]   Skewed distributions in finance and actuarial science: a review [J].
Adcock, Christopher ;
Eling, Martin ;
Loperfido, Nicola .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2015, 21 (13-14) :1253-1281
[3]   In Defense of Portfolio Optimization: What If We Can Forecast? [J].
Allen, David ;
Lizieri, Colin ;
Satchell, Stephen .
FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2019, 75 (03) :20-38
[4]  
Auer B. R., Journal of Risk, V24, P43
[5]   COMPARING THE SMALL-SAMPLE ESTIMATION ERROR OF CONCEPTUALLY DIFFERENT RISK MEASURES [J].
Auer, Benjamin R. ;
Schuhmacher, Frank .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FINANCE, 2021, 24 (05)
[6]   ON THE ROLE OF SKEWNESS, KURTOSIS, AND THE LOCATION AND SCALE CONDITION IN A SHARPE RATIO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SETTING [J].
Auer, Benjamin R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FINANCE, 2015, 18 (06)
[7]   Does the choice of performance measure influence the evaluation of commodity investments? [J].
Auer, Benjamin R. .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 38 :142-150
[8]   Robust evidence on the similarity of Sharpe ratio and drawdown-based hedge fund performance rankings [J].
Auer, Benjamin R. ;
Schuhmacher, Frank .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2013, 24 :153-165
[9]   Central limits and financial risk [J].
Barbieri, Angelo ;
Dubikovsky, Vladislav ;
Gladkevich, Alexei ;
Goldberg, Lisa R. ;
Hayes, Michael Y. .
QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2010, 10 (10) :1091-1097
[10]   On portfolio optimization: Imposing the right constraints [J].
Behr, Patrick ;
Guettler, Andre ;
Miebs, Felix .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (04) :1232-1242