Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs

被引:0
|
作者
Bould, Em [1 ]
Tate, Robyn [2 ,3 ]
Simpson, Grahame [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Brusco, Natasha [5 ]
Licciardi, Lisa
Callaway, Libby [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Frankston, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Kolling Inst, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, Australia
[3] Northern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, John Walsh Ctr Rehabil Res, Sydney, Australia
[4] Ingham Inst, Brain Injury Rehabil Res Grp, Sydney, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Ageing & Independent Living RAIL Res Ctr, Rehabil, Frankston, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Ageing & Independent Living RAIL Res Ctr, Dept Occupat Therapy Rehabil, Frankston, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Ageing & Independent Living RAIL Res Ctr, Dept Occupat Therapy Rehabil, 47-49 Moorooduc Hwy, Frankston 3199, Australia
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2023年 / 12卷
关键词
acquired brain injury; assistive technology; clinical research protocol; economic evaluation; executive function; single-case experimental design; THERAPY GOALS; REHABILITATION; SCALE; BEHAVIOR; INTERVENTION; RELIABILITY; INTEGRATION; QUALITY; HONOS; NEEDS;
D O I
10.2196/48503
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Executive function, including prospective memory, initiating, planning, and sequencing everyday activities, is frequently affected by acquired brain injury (ABI). Executive dysfunction necessitates the use of compensatory cognitive strategies and, in more severe cases, human support over time. To compensate for the executive dysfunction experienced, growing options for electronic mainstream and assistive technologies may be used by people with ABI and their supporters.Objective: We outline the study protocol for a series of single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) to evaluate the effectiveness of smart home, mobile, and/or wearable technologies in reducing executive function difficulties following ABI.Methods: Up to 10 adults with ABI who experience executive dysfunction and have sufficient cognitive capacity to provide informed consent will be recruited across Victoria and New South Wales, Australia. Other key inclusion criteria are that they have substantial support needs for everyday living and reside in community dwellings. On the basis of the participant's identified goal(s) and target behavior(s), a specific electronic assistive technology will be selected for application. Both identification of the target behavior(s) and selection of the assistive technology will be determined via consultation with each participant (and their key support person, if applicable). The choice of SCED will be individualized for each participant based on the type of technology used in the intervention, the difficulty level of the behavior targeted for change, and the anticipated rate of change. For each SCED, repeated measurements of the target behavior(s) during the baseline condition will provide performance data for comparison with the performance data collected during the intervention condition (with technology introduced). Secondary outcome measures will evaluate the impact of the intervention. The protocol includes 2 customizable Microsoft Excel spreadsheets for electronic record keeping.Results: Recruitment period is June 2022 through March 2024. Trial results for the individual participants will be graphed and analyzed separately using structured visual analysis supplemented with statistical analysis. Analysis will focus on important features of the data, including both within-and between-phase comparisons for response level, trend, variability, immediacy, consistency, and overlap. An exploratory economic evaluation will determine the impact on formal and informal support usage, together with quality of life, following the implementation of the new technological intervention.Conclusions: The study has been designed to test the cause-effect functional relationships between the intervention-in this case, electronic assistive technology-and its effect in changing the target behavior(s). The evaluation evidence gained will offer new insights into the application of various electronic assistive technologies for people who experience executive dysfunction following ABI. Furthermore, the results will help increase the capacity of key stakeholders to harness the potential of technology to build independence and reduce the cost of care for this population.Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12622000835741, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000835741.aspx International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48503
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cognitive training approaches to remediate attention and executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: A single-case series
    Dymowski, Alicia Rhian
    Ponsford, Jennie Louise
    Willmott, Catherine
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2016, 26 (5-6) : 866 - 894
  • [32] Text messages reduce memory failures in adults with brain injury: A single-case experimental design
    Cruz, Gabriela
    Petrie, Susan
    Goudie, Nicola
    Kersel, Denyse
    Evans, Jonathan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2016, 79 (10) : 598 - 606
  • [33] COOK technology to support meal preparation following a severe traumatic brain injury: a usability mixed-methods single-case study in a real-world environment
    Gagnon-Roy, Mireille
    Bier, Nathalie
    Giroux, Sylvain
    Couture, Melanie
    Pigot, Helene
    Le Dorze, Guylaine
    Gosselin, Nadia
    Zarshenas, Sareh
    Hendryckx, Charlotte
    Bottari, Carolina
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (05) : 2113 - 2130
  • [34] An assistive-technology intervention for verbose speech after traumatic brain injury - A single case study
    Kirsch, NL
    Shenton, M
    Spirl, E
    Simpson, R
    LoPresti, E
    Schreckenghost, D
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2004, 19 (05) : 366 - 377
  • [35] Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Novel Brain-Computer Interface Neuromodulative Intervention to Relieve Neuropathic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Single-Case Experimental Design With Multiple Baselines
    Hesam-Shariati, Negin
    Newton-John, Toby
    Singh, Avinash K.
    Cortes, Carlos A. Tirado
    Tien-Thong Nguyen
    Craig, Ashley
    Middleton, James W.
    Jensen, Mark P.
    Trost, Zina
    Lin, Chin-Teng
    Gustin, Sylvia M.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2020, 9 (09):
  • [36] A summary of reporting guidelines and evaluation domains for using single-case experimental designs and recommendations for the study of eating disorders
    De Young, Kyle P.
    Bottera, Angeline R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2018, 51 (07) : 617 - 628
  • [37] A metacognitive contextual intervention to enhance error awareness and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury: A single-case experimental design
    Ownsworth, T
    Fleming, J
    Desbois, J
    Strong, J
    Kuipers, P
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 12 (01) : 54 - 63
  • [38] Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Therapy for Anxiety in Williams Beuren Syndrome Using a Smartphone App: Protocol for a Single-Case Experiment
    Lehman, Natacha
    Trouillet, Raphael
    Genevieve, David
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [39] Community-based practical behavioral intervention in public transportation for people with acquired brain injury: study of two cases using a single-case experimental design study
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Miyahara, Tomoko
    Tanemura, Rumi
    NEUROCASE, 2022, 28 (03) : 302 - 309
  • [40] Evaluating the effectiveness of therapeutic horse riding for children and young people experiencing disability: a single-case experimental design study
    Martin, Rachelle A.
    Taylor, William J.
    Surgenor, Lois J.
    Graham, Fiona P.
    Levack, William M. M.
    Blampied, Neville M.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (26) : 3734 - 3743