Gap-filling properties of adhesives used for cross-laminated timber

被引:0
|
作者
Miyazaki, Junko [1 ]
Miyamoto, Kohta [2 ]
Tohmura, Shin-ichiro [2 ]
Ohashi, Yoshinori [1 ]
Matsumoto, Kazushige [1 ]
Furuta, Naoyuki [1 ]
Takanashi, Ryuya [1 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Res Org, Forest Prod Res Inst, 1-10, Nishikagura, Asahikawa, Hokkaido 0710198, Japan
[2] Forestry & Forest Prod Res Inst, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
BONDING QUALITY; SHEAR-STRENGTH; CLT;
D O I
10.1007/s00107-023-01981-0
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Cross-laminated timber (CLT) laminates layers of laminae side by side, with the fiber direction of each layer orthogonal to each other. Therefore, any error in the thickness of the laminae may cause gaps in the glue lines, leading to adhesion failure. In this study, a three-layer CLT with a thin lamina inserted in the inner layer was manufactured, and the gap-filling performance of adhesives and the allowable error for lamina thickness were investigated. The outer layer of CLT was arranged with 30.0 mm-thick laminae, and the inner layer alternated between 30.0 mm-thick lamina and thinner laminae (29.9, 29.7, and 29.5 mm). One-component polyurethane adhesives (PUR), emulsion polymer-isocyanate (EPI) adhesives, and phenol-resorcinol-formaldehyde resin (PRF) were used. The glue line thickened when the lamina thinned down in PUR and EPI. By contrast, the glue line thickness at the lamina thickness of 29.5 mm in PRF was almost the same as the glue line thickness without gaps. PUR demonstrated low delamination and a high wood failure rate (WF) even at 0.5 mm lamina thickness error, meeting the criteria set by the Japanese Agricultural Standard (JAS). Conversely, EPI failed to meet the JAS requirements for a lamina thickness error exceeding 0.3 mm. On the other hand, PRF exhibited favorable adhesive performance within a 0.3 mm lamina thickness error, with delamination and WF meeting the criteria of the standard.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 134
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bonding performance of cross-laminated timber-bamboo composites
    Dong, Weiqun
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Chen, Guojun
    Wang, Yi
    Huang, Qianzhi
    Gong, Meng
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 63
  • [22] Investigation of rolling shear properties of cross-laminated timber (CLT) and comparison of experimental approaches
    Nero, Richard
    Christopher, Philip
    Ngo, Tuan
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2022, 316
  • [23] Diaphragm shear and diagonal compression testing of cross-laminated timber
    Sharifi, Jonas
    Sharifi, Zahra
    Berg, Sven
    Ekevad, Mats
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 3 (11):
  • [24] Prediction of withdrawal resistance for a screw in hybrid cross-laminated timber
    Pang, Sung-Jun
    Ahn, Kyung-Sun
    Kang, Seog Goo
    Oh, Jung-Kwon
    JOURNAL OF WOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 66 (01)
  • [25] Diaphragm shear and diagonal compression testing of cross-laminated timber
    Jonas Sharifi
    Zahra Sharifi
    Sven Berg
    Mats Ekevad
    SN Applied Sciences, 2021, 3
  • [26] Experimental determination of the charring rate of cross-laminated timber panels
    Alanen, Mika
    Malaska, Mikko
    Salminen, Mikko
    Paavola, Pyry
    Pajunen, Sami
    FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2024, 146
  • [27] Projected Cross-Laminated Timber Demand and Lumber Supply Analysis
    Brandt, Kristin
    Latta, Greg
    Camenzind, Dane
    Dolan, Dan
    Bender, Don
    Wilson, Alex
    Wolcott, Michael
    BIORESOURCES, 2021, 16 (01) : 862 - 881
  • [28] Picture frame and diagonal compression testing of cross-laminated timber
    Jonas Turesson
    Anders Björnfot
    Sven Berg
    Mats Ekevad
    Roberto Tomasi
    Materials and Structures, 2019, 52
  • [29] Techno-Economic Analysis for Manufacturing Cross-Laminated Timber
    Brandt, Kristin
    Wilson, Alex
    Bender, Donald
    Dolan, James D.
    Wolcott, Michael P.
    BIORESOURCES, 2019, 14 (04) : 7790 - 7804
  • [30] General shell section properties and failure model for cross-laminated timber obtained by numerical homogenization
    Furtmueller, Thomas
    Giger, Benjamin
    Adam, Christoph
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 163 : 77 - 92