Ecological unequal exchange between China and European Union: An investigation from global value chains and carbon emissions viewpoint

被引:4
作者
Zhang, Yulong [1 ,3 ]
Liao, Cuiping [1 ]
Pan, Binbin [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Energy Convers, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Marxism, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Inst Energy Convers, 2 Nengyuan Rd, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecological unequal exchange; Carbon emission; Global value chain; China; European union; POLLUTION HAVEN; CO2; EMISSIONS; EU; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apr.2023.101661
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
European Union (EU) becomes the largest trade partner of China since 2005, and China is the second-largest trade partner of the EU. However, the deepening interdependence between these two major economies also brings worries about the ecological unequal exchange (EUE). Comparing the carbon emissions of China and the EU, the most distinct difference is that the carbon emissions of China have raised greatly from 2010 to 2020, while the carbon emissions of the EU dropped significantly in the same period. The EUE between China and the US has been studied by many scholars, while the EUE between China and the EU is rarely explored in literature, especially during the China-US trade disputes since 2018 and Coronavirus pandemic since 2019. Employing the MRIO model, we assess embodied carbon emission from the value-added perspective of China and EU bilateral trade with 26 sectors, then investigate the embodied carbon emission sectors in import for intermediate and final consumption. The results suggest that global value chains mean "global pollution chains", too, and emissions produced from the export trade of the EU countries to China much less China's emissions produced from the export trade of China to the EU, which endorse the EUE theory.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Ecological macroeconomics in the open economy: Sustainability, unequal exchange and policy coordination in a center-periphery model
    Althouse, Jeffrey
    Guarini, Giulio
    Gabriel Porcile, Jose
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 172
  • [2] Pollution haven or halo effect? A comparative analysis of developing and developed countries
    Benzerrouk, Zakia
    Abid, Mehdi
    Sekrafi, Habib
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 : 4862 - 4871
  • [3] China has emerged as an aspirant economy
    Bruton, Garry D.
    Ahlstrom, David
    Chen, Juanyi
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2021, 38 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [4] Will developing countries become pollution havens for developed countries? An empirical investigation in the Belt and Road
    Cai, Xiang
    Che, Xiahui
    Zhu, Bangzhu
    Zhao, Juan
    Xie, Rui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 198 : 624 - 632
  • [5] The Impact on Carbon Emissions of China with the Trade Situation versus the US
    Chou, Jieming
    Yang, Fan
    Wang, Zhongxiu
    Dong, Wenjie
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [6] Tracing CO2 emissions in China-US trade: A global value chain perspective
    Dai, Feng
    Yang, Jijun
    Guo, Hao
    Sun, Huaping
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 775
  • [7] Reassessing pollution haven effect in global value chains
    Duan, Yuwan
    Ji, Ting
    Yu, Tuotuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 284
  • [8] The theory of unequal ecological exchange: a Marx-Odum dialectic
    Foster, John Bellamy
    Holleman, Hannah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2014, 41 (02) : 199 - 233
  • [9] Givens J.E., 2019, SOC COMPASS, V13, P15
  • [10] Haq SMA, 2011, J ENVIRON PROT ECOL, V12, P698