Can the PREX-2 and CREX results be understood by relativistic mean-field models with the astrophysical constraints?

被引:19
作者
Miyatsu, Tsuyoshi [1 ,2 ]
Cheoun, Myung-Ki [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Kyungsik [3 ]
Saito, Koichi [4 ]
机构
[1] Soongsil Univ, Dept Phys, Seoul 06978, South Korea
[2] Soongsil Univ, OMEG Inst, Seoul 06978, South Korea
[3] Korea Aerosp Univ, Sch Liberal Arts & Sci, Goyang 10540, South Korea
[4] Tokyo Univ Sci, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Phys & Astron, Noda 2788510, Japan
关键词
Relativistic mean-field models; PREX-2 and CREX experiments; Isospin-asymmetric nuclear matter; Neutron stars; MESON COUPLING MODEL; SYMMETRY ENERGY; NUCLEAR; STATE; TERM; EQUATION; MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138013
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We construct new effective interactions using the relativistic mean-field models with the isoscalar-and isovector-meson mixing, & sigma;252 and & omega;& mu;& omega;& mu;p & nu;p & nu;. Taking into account the particle flow data in heavy-ion collisions, the observed mass of PSR J0740+6620, and the tidal deformability of a neutron star from the binary merger event, GW170817, we study the ground-state properties of finite, closed-shell nuclei, and try to explain the recent results from the PREX-2 and CREX experiments. It is found that the & sigma;-& delta; mixing is very powerful to understand the terrestrial experiments and astrophysical observations of neutron stars self-consistently. We can predict the large neutron skin thickness of 208Pb, R208 skin = 0.243 fm, using the slope parameter of nuclear symmetry energy, L = 70 MeV, which is consistent with the PREX-2 result. However, to explain the CREX data, it is preferable to adopt the small value of L = 20 MeV. It is very difficult to understand the PREX-2 and CREX results simultaneously within relativistic mean-field models.& COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons .org /licenses /by /4 .0/). Funded by SCOAP3.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Constraining the relativistic mean-field models from PREX-2 data: effective forces revisited
    Pattnaik, Jeet Amrit
    Panda, R. N.
    Bhuyan, M.
    Patra, S. K.
    CHINESE PHYSICS C, 2022, 46 (09)
  • [2] Trends of nuclear matter and neutron-star observables post CREX-PREX-II results within the relativistic mean field model
    Kumar, Mukul
    Kumar, Sunil
    Queena
    Kumar, Raj
    Dhiman, Shashi K.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2024, 110 (05)
  • [3] Relativistic mean-field hadronic models under nuclear matter constraints
    Dutra, M.
    Lourenco, O.
    Avancini, S. S.
    Carlson, B. V.
    Delfino, A.
    Menezes, D. P.
    Providencia, C.
    Typel, S.
    Stone, J. R.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2014, 90 (05):
  • [4] Astrophysical constraints on nuclear EOSs and coupling constants in relativistic-mean-field models
    Xia, Cheng-Jun
    Xie, Wen-Jie
    Bakhiet, Mohemmedelnazier
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 110 (11)
  • [5] Relativistic mean-field mass models
    Pena-Arteaga, D.
    Goriely, S.
    Chamel, N.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL A, 2016, 52 (10)
  • [6] The symmetry energy γ parameter of relativistic mean-field models
    Dutra, Mariana
    Lourenco, Odilon
    Hen, Or
    Piasetzky, Eliezer
    Menezes, Debora P.
    CHINESE PHYSICS C, 2018, 42 (06)
  • [7] Instability of baryonic matter in relativistic mean-field models
    Bashir, Waseem
    Uddin, Saeed
    Parra, Rameez Ahmad
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 2018, 969 : 151 - 172
  • [8] Regression analysis of the nuclear symmetry energy for relativistic mean-field models
    Bednarek, Ilona
    Olchawa, Wieslaw
    Sladkowski, Jan
    Syska, Jacek
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2022, 106 (05)
  • [9] The symmetry energy γ parameter of relativistic mean-field models
    Mariana Dutra
    Odilon Lourenco
    Or Hen
    Eliezer Piasetzky
    Debora P.Menezes
    Chinese Physics C, 2018, 42 (06) : 92 - 104
  • [10] Antikaons in neutron star studied with recent versions of relativistic mean-field models
    Gupta, Neha
    Arumugam, P.
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEUS-NUCLEUS COLLISIONS (NN2012), 2013, 420